Posted on 10/09/2014 9:31:23 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
On the Supreme Court’s decision not to take up same-sex marriage:
RENEE ELLMERS: That was a states issue. In my personal opinion, I did feel my concern about the actual legislation that the state was putting forward, I did feel it went too far.
(SNIP)
Q: What happened to immigration reform?
ELLMERS: I wish we had addressed it. We were this close, we were very, very close to starting to vote on immigration reform.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsobserver.com ...
“On the Supreme Court’s decision not to take up same-sex marriage:
RENEE ELLMERS: That was a states issue
...”
So was slavery....according to president Grant.
Traitor
Commas can make a difference. Although, in this case, maybe not.
If she’s pro amnesty, I’m voting against her.
There’s a guy in my neighborhood who works for Cisco Systems who told me he has not had a raise in almost 10 years. Most new hires these days are immigrants he said.
The same is true at most tech firms unfortunately. Yet Ellmers seemingly wants to bring in more workers to the USA via amnesty? Is she a moron or what!
how could you not answer this by stating the obvious. the border is mostly air.
Q: There’s the difficulty of sealing the border. Many people say this is an important step to any immigration plan. How would you seal the border? It’s mostly water. Is it realistic?
she is one of the biggest amnesty whores in the house ...she’s the one that called Laure Ingraham ignorant when Laura called her out on her ridiculous crap about immigration...she is nothing more than a belligerent arrogant corrupt moron illegal alien lover
“If she’s pro amnesty, I’m voting against her....”
**************************************************************************************
She is indeed a MAJOR amnesty supporter. Good for you voting against her. I wish I could be in your district to add to your vote. Please get your family and friends to do the same. She won’t be missed in the House as she’ll be more than replaced with actual constitutional conservative Republicans being newly elected this cycle.
“AIKEN: There’s a problem with a lot of things. Constituent services. I know it because people tell me. I know it because people in this district have to compare her to who they had before. Bob Etheridge was great at constituent services. Howard Coble was great at it.”
Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/10/07/4214915/clay-aiken-on-why-hes-running.html#storylink=cpy
isn’t Elmers the politician who lied to Conservatives about being one and joined the Boehner establishment after getting elected???
Yeah...by all means vote for Clay Aiken...he is sooo anti-amnesty. Not.
Either way you get hosed .
I don’t think the kind of “service” Aiken would provide (on his knees) is the kind that voters are looking for.
The kind of thinking that got us BHO. Nice going, pal. Sheesh...
After reading some of the comments on this thread, it looks to me like Clay Aiken will be elected to the US Senate by CONSERVATIVES. Who’da thunk it, huh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.