[Alberta's Child]

Well, no. A third party has now been introduced into your "decision to die": a medical facility and staff who are going to help kill this woman. This is where a very important line is crossed.

And if that doesn't make you pause, think about a medical insurance company -- or government bureaucracy -- that has a huge financial interest in seeing this woman die quickly.

[freedumb2003]

>>Well, no. A third party has now been introduced into your “decision to die”: a medical facility and staff who are going to help kill this woman. <<

So a building owner is a “third party” when a person jumps of the roof?

>>And if that doesn’t make you pause, think about a medical insurance company — or government bureaucracy — that has a huge financial interest in seeing this woman die quickly.<<

Please provide any article supporting this tired “slippery slope” assertion.

[Hot Tabasco]

A third party has now been introduced into your "decision to die":

Actually it hasn't, it's been there all along since she was first diagnosed with terminal brain cancer and brought doctors into the equation.

Could one not make the argument that her desire to seek treatment for an untreatable condition was a violation of God's will to return her to heaven..........?

Would God also condemn her to hell if she had chosen NOT to seek treatment for any temporary life prolonging treatments?