Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Send British nukes to US if Scotland votes Yes say military chiefs
express.co.uk ^ | September 14, 2014 | Marco Giannangeli

Posted on 09/13/2014 8:36:49 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2014 8:36:49 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Sure, why not?

They sent us their gold, didn’t they?


2 posted on 09/13/2014 8:42:42 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Why not an English port?


3 posted on 09/13/2014 8:43:09 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I have a friend who has done business in Scotland for years and used to have a facility there. He just returned from a two week trip this week and says if this vote passes the negative financial impacts will be huge - not just there but rippling all over the world.


4 posted on 09/13/2014 8:45:09 PM PDT by Baynative (Free people are not equal, equal people are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

And they trust that Muslim idiot Obama with them??


5 posted on 09/13/2014 8:45:37 PM PDT by ZULU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qLDFiQcjlY Impeach Obama in 2015 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Dickweed might not like it


6 posted on 09/13/2014 8:47:31 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Kerry, as Obama's plenipotentiary, is a paradox - the physical presence of a geopolitical absence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

The article said, it’s because they don’t have the facilities elsewhere to dock them.


7 posted on 09/13/2014 8:48:15 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
Why not an English port?

Specialized facilities for servicing nuclear subs need to be constructed. The assumption is that those that are in Scotland become the property of the Republic of Scotland, assuming the new nation becomes a republic.

8 posted on 09/13/2014 8:48:29 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Scottish Trident base claims ‘preposterous threat’
The British Government denies reports it is examining plans to designate Faslane as sovereign UK territory in case Scots back independence next year.
11 Jul 2013
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/10173371/Scottish-Trident-base-claims-preposterous-threat.html


9 posted on 09/13/2014 8:49:10 PM PDT by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box then 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Thanks.

Of course, Scotland could join NATO.


10 posted on 09/13/2014 8:50:23 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
I have a friend who has done business in Scotland for years and used to have a facility there. He just returned from a two week trip this week and says if this vote passes the negative financial impacts will be huge - not just there but rippling all over the world.

I seriously doubt it. Scotland has less than 10% of the UK's population. England will get on fine without Scotland (and Wales and Northern Ireland). Much of the English Crown's expansion into the rest of what came to be known as Great Britain was a way to forestall recurrent raids by the Welsh, the Scots and the Irish into England, the most fertile and productive part of the realm. The other part of England's rationale for dominating the British Isles was to deny the continental powers a staging area for the invasion of England. Today, the only thing the continental powers are marching towards is welfare state insolvency.

11 posted on 09/13/2014 8:57:33 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The Scots are coming, the Scots are coming!!! :-)


12 posted on 09/13/2014 8:58:24 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Because you don’t operate and maintain something as specialized and sophisticated as a nuclear armed nuclear submarine out of some random commercial port. Not even out of a high-end commercial port.


13 posted on 09/13/2014 9:12:14 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Lease the facilities from Scotland


14 posted on 09/13/2014 9:23:52 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Not to worry. Obama could screw this up too.


15 posted on 09/13/2014 9:26:10 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
Lease the facilities from Scotland

Why pay billions to Scotland that could be used to build a new facility? Uncle Sam will provide at cost (or for free) what Scotland will charge an arm and a leg to lease. Your statement suggests that you believe the Scots will deal in good faith. Actual SNP rhetoric indicates a philosophy not very different from Venezuela's late Hugo Chavez.

16 posted on 09/13/2014 9:50:28 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

> Uncle Sam will provide at cost (or for free)

Why should the US pay for England’s problem?


17 posted on 09/13/2014 10:07:32 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
0bama might well block that, given his propensity to hanging our allies out to dry at every available opportunity. One can only imagine the shrieking the would emanate from every anti-nuke kook and anti-war poseur - Medea Benjamin, white courtesy phone please - who currently is bursting with frustration at being unable to vent at their Dear Leader for his policies in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

The sad truth is that under this disgusting administration the United States is no longer a reliable ally to people who have bled for us. It's been that way for the better part of six years now, and we have two to go during which the keeping of foreign policy will remain in the hands of John Kerry and Barack Hussein no matter what the House and Senate look like, and anyone who thinks that the country and the world can't take permanent damage from it hasn't been paying attention.

18 posted on 09/13/2014 10:10:02 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
Lease the facilities from Scotland


Salmond has his own plans to turn the sub base of Faslane into the HQ for the Scottish Armed Forces.

Moving the subs out early would probably be a good idea for both sides, and on a much better timetable than mentioned below.

From a report on the last debate -

Alastair Darling said removing Trident would mean a loss of 8000 jobs. But, replied Salmond, we plan to keep Faslane as the base for Scottish Defence, with all the jobs that implies. Darling countered with the Royal United Services Institute’s claim that Trident couldn’t be moved until 2028. Salmond came back with the fact that RUSI actually said that setting up all the infrastructure elsewhere for Trident and its submarines would take that long. The removal of Trident could easily be accomplished in the proposed 5½ years. The fact that no one could use it for several more years would be to everyone’s benefit.

19 posted on 09/13/2014 10:30:25 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
I have a friend who has done business in Scotland for years and used to have a facility there. He just returned from a two week trip this week and says if this vote passes the negative financial impacts will be huge - not just there but rippling all over the world.

The EU especially does not like citizens getting ideas of self determination. They like citizens obeying instructions from non elected bureaucrats.

20 posted on 09/13/2014 10:30:41 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson