Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe

Why not an English port?


3 posted on 09/13/2014 8:43:09 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

The article said, it’s because they don’t have the facilities elsewhere to dock them.


7 posted on 09/13/2014 8:48:15 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76
Why not an English port?

Specialized facilities for servicing nuclear subs need to be constructed. The assumption is that those that are in Scotland become the property of the Republic of Scotland, assuming the new nation becomes a republic.

8 posted on 09/13/2014 8:48:29 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

Because you don’t operate and maintain something as specialized and sophisticated as a nuclear armed nuclear submarine out of some random commercial port. Not even out of a high-end commercial port.


13 posted on 09/13/2014 9:12:14 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson