Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Kansas Supreme Court has agreed to hear Chad Taylor's petition to have his name removed from the ballot for U.S. Senate. He was judge shopping and has probably won the blue light special: 4 of the 7 judges were appointed by Kathleen Sebelius.

The local media have all be acting like Kobach has been seized by the Devil is is just making up his ruling that Taylor failed to comply with the law.

1 posted on 09/11/2014 3:21:11 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: centurion316

It would be funny if the court decided that he could remove his name from the ballot but that the result would be his opponent was now running unopposed.


2 posted on 09/11/2014 3:23:56 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

I screamed at my tv set, when they couched it as Kobach being an obstructionist. They didn’t even mention the very clear law.


3 posted on 09/11/2014 3:25:18 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316
The local media have all be acting like Kobach has been seized by the Devil is is just making up his ruling that Taylor failed to comply with the law.

Of course. In court after court, the finding is always the same: Democrats don't have to follow election laws if doing so might mean they lose.

4 posted on 09/11/2014 3:25:54 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

So if the supreme court takes him off the ballot, then would they have another conundrum for having to put another democrat on the ballot?

Crazy stuff.

CGato


7 posted on 09/11/2014 3:32:53 PM PDT by Conservative Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Link to KS Statute:

http://www.ksrevisor.org/statutes/chapters/ch25/025_003_0006b.html

Its pretty clear. Taylor either has to be dead or “incapable of fulfilling the duties of office”.

Its practically impossible for Taylor to say he’s incapable, since the next obvious question would be why is he a sitting DA, if he is so incapable of holding office.

Its a 1997 law...not some ancient law that nobody remembers the reasoning behind.

They’re all political whores - willing to do just about anything to gain a senate seat. When the KS Supreme court rules in Kathleen’s...ahem...Mccaskill’s...ahem...Reid’s...oh yeah, Taylor’s favor, Kansas will have abandoned the rule of law.


8 posted on 09/11/2014 3:35:27 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

He should appeal to the NJ supreme court. Not only would they take the case, they would even name his replacement, if they HAD to.....


14 posted on 09/11/2014 3:40:56 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Kobach should announce that he will not abide by their ruling if they do not follow KS law. Otherwise Kansas is about to be Torricelli’d.


19 posted on 09/11/2014 4:23:12 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Well, that’s that. He is off the ballot. Dems in charge of that court.


29 posted on 09/11/2014 6:53:41 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Here we go-the Democrats will get the rule changed!


34 posted on 09/11/2014 10:19:18 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316
...a requirement under state statutes...

But...but...but...statutes can only apply to Republicans.

39 posted on 09/12/2014 6:22:42 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Islamopobia:The Irrational Fear Of Being Beheaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

In other words, the Democrat will be above the laws on the books AGAIN


40 posted on 09/12/2014 7:08:58 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

How predictable. Political hacks acting as judges will simply determine a result and craft the reasoning behind it. It is not that our judicial system is broken, it is more that it has been corrupted. Having said that, the harder the democrats work to get Taylor off of the ballot, the more it makes Orman look culpable. Soon enough, Orman will be equated with the democrat party in them mind of the voter.


46 posted on 09/12/2014 7:48:56 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

“But, but, that law wasn’t meant for ME!”


57 posted on 09/12/2014 3:14:45 PM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

The ruling will be he can’t have his name removed because he’s withdrawing for election ‘strategery’.

It’s a political issue and the law is clear.


59 posted on 09/12/2014 6:30:08 PM PDT by Usagi_yo (I don't have a soul, I'm a soul that has a body. -- Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

So Democrats in Kansas are so stupid they can’t just not vote for someone with a D next to his name even if he now doesn’t want the job?

That says a lot.


64 posted on 09/14/2014 10:10:05 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson