Posted on 08/24/2014 9:50:21 PM PDT by chessplayer
In a Friday op-ed which appeared in the paper's international print edition on Saturday and which can reasonably be seen as giving voice to an editorial board which wouldn't dare put their name to it, La Salle University Political Science Professor Michael Boyle strenuously objected to recent characterizations of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
We can't call ISIS "evil." We also shouldn't call them a "cancer," or "savage," or "barbaric." Oh, and the fact that George W. Bush called Al Qaeda "evildoers" is why ISIS came to be, and why our problems with radical Islam are now worse.
Well professor, if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....
History is being repeated.
A weak DNC admin does nothing about a rising threat , leaves office and is followed by a GOP administration, that must in months make up for 8 years of White House play time.
What a ****ing idiot...
All the beheadings, all the forced circumcisions, all the forced clitorectomies, all the mass executions...
Moral hazard? No. These are morals crimes against humanity.
Reading the NYT Op Ed section is anther moral crime against humanity.
If the Left policed themselves 1/10,000th as much as they do Tea Party members/Conservatives, there would be few problems in this nation.
It is a real moral hazard not to call them evil
La Salle University Political Science Professor Michael Boyle
It’s actually worse than that. Unlike Bush when the charges were made against him by the Left, Obama does face the guilt of being an international criminal of sorts, and in particular a traitor to the United States.
This man is trafficking in children across international lines.
He sought financing for this months before it exploded. He knew in advance, did nothing to stop it, and facilitated it every step of the way.
He is a human trafficker.
I heard it is a religion of peace.
but can you just imagine what he called the tea party.
This is what happned when we arfned of the coming 9-11 attacks.
The exact same thing.
This time the attack on the blue cities shall not tug at my heart strings.
And the NYT is morally bankrupt, so what platform do they claim to deserve to make such an asinine proclamation?
How about “Naughty”? “Less than morally compatible”? “Beyond the good and evil of mere mortals”?
Cowering behind his computer. Pathetic!
The NY Slime is a moral hazard. Another reason the “the old gray whore” should be out of existence. “All the news that is fit to print” has become “all the news that we cannot morally defend and does not fit our leftist viewpoint. “ What a joke. Pinch, give it up—your days are numbered and it could not happen to a better example of a commie RAT. I hope you go down hard you pathetic excuse for a “journalist.”
Well I would say that he is a prime example of the definition.
Those with an IQ of 0 to 25 (an IQ of 100 is average) were called idiots, 26 to 50 were called imbeciles and 51 to 70 were called morons. Morons could communicate and learn common tasks; imbeciles stalled mentally at about six years old; and idiots couldn't respond to stimulus or communicate with any level of competency.
These are the same idiots that thought Stalin was a wonderful leader and Hitler was a barbarian.
He’s afraid they’ll track him down an kill him.
> an editorial board which wouldn’t dare put their name to it, La Salle University Political Science Professor Michael Boyle strenuously objected to recent characterizations of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
Thanks chessplayer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.