Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna
The idea that the judicial branch of the state would have the authority to question a political act, by a political branch is what constitutes the "very dangerous precedent."

Yeah that would be, but the poster above said,

"And if Perry's veto is allowed to stand, that also would set a very dangerous precedent"

which is nutty and it deserved the "LoL."

40 posted on 08/17/2014 11:34:44 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

I was actually noting his take [”very dangerous precedent”] and yours. We’ll see if it’s a laughing matter when it goes to a judge; I thought Tom Delay’s case was unserious, but it took eight years and a conviction/reversal to find its way through the system, so...


55 posted on 08/17/2014 11:53:42 AM PDT by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson