Yeah that would be, but the poster above said,
"And if Perry's veto is allowed to stand, that also would set a very dangerous precedent"
which is nutty and it deserved the "LoL."
I was actually noting his take [”very dangerous precedent”] and yours. We’ll see if it’s a laughing matter when it goes to a judge; I thought Tom Delay’s case was unserious, but it took eight years and a conviction/reversal to find its way through the system, so...