I was actually noting his take [”very dangerous precedent”] and yours. We’ll see if it’s a laughing matter when it goes to a judge; I thought Tom Delay’s case was unserious, but it took eight years and a conviction/reversal to find its way through the system, so...
I believe it’s going to be much harder for the DU Dems to obfuscate the facts than it was against Delay. This case is easier to explain and understand that it is all a political show trial, although Perry and his allies have to be active in explaining to the public the Demrat bull.