You obviously do not have any understanding of the difference between an entrance and an exit wound.
Look where the squad car was located and where brown’s body was located in relations hip to the car.
The perp was running away.
Now if the cop shot the perp to death while the perp was inside the car or just outside the car…. that would be justifiable.
From the kid’s bud...he was shot before he started running. His friend said there was blood gushing through his shirt. I’m betting there’s only one bullet hole...that’s why crump wants another autopsy.
I don’t see any wound on his back, entrance or exit. I suppose it’s possible there’s an entrance wound on the side not photographed but I don’t think such a shot would be at least immediately fatal. As the shot that killed him was.
Looking at that picture has changed things for me. I think it possible it went down like this:
Brown reaches for the gun, in a struggle he was shot once (not fatally) then starts to run away. The cop gets out of the car and orders him to stop, possibly firing a warning shot to get his point across.
He turns around, facing the cop (who most likely had his weapon drawn then), and he even maybe put his hands up. But only to give the cop pause, as his real intent (and final act) was to start running towards the cop again (thinking with his hands up he wouldn’t fire). But he did.
This scenario as I described fits all the reports we’ve heard till now. And it also fits what we see in the photos of the aftermath.
And another thing if he was shot in the back (and that was the fatal shot) his head woukdnt be pointing towards the blood trail. It would be pointing away from it (as the blood is clearly running downhill.)