Really? You try that excuse after someone broke into your house, punched you in the face and you shot him 35 feet from your front door as he was running away UNARMED.
You would be charged with manslaughter at a minimum and murder most likely. So you advocate that agents of the state do not have to follow laws that govern the rest of us?
ever heard of ‘Castle Doctrine’?
The evidence doesn't fit your misleading statement:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3193194/posts?page=172#172
He has resisted arrest, assaulted a police office, attempted to disarm the officer, though the shop lifting charge is minor the assault on the clerk was a violent and clearly another felony, so just how many felonies must a person commit in your opinion before you consider him to be a dangerous felon?
The police have more responsibility when dealing with fleeing violent felons and deal with them more often than non-police. Most states have specific laws that apply to police officers in those situations. I think you should learn the law and history behind it before you whine and bitch about it on FR.
Yes. . knocked nearly out, staggering, fuzzy thinking, thinking he is coming back to finish the job if you pass out. . .