Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter stumps for ‘crap-a—’ GOP
Politico ^ | 8/13/14 | Kendall Breitman

Posted on 08/13/2014 6:43:02 AM PDT by Night Hides Not

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter is saying that when it comes to midterm elections, it is better to vote for “crap-a— Republicans” than any Democrats.

“We can’t just abandon the field right now, you have to vote Republican even if it’s for crap-a— Republicans, and I would name them but I’m not going to,” Coulter said Tuesday on Fox News’s “Hannity” after host Sean Hannity said he is losing confidence in the GOP.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coulter; eliteprostitute
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: Arm_Bears

Thank you SO much for Leader Harry Reid!!!! ANd Speaker Pelosi!!! The Democrats have EARNED your vote!!! Thanks ever so much, big thinker!!!


81 posted on 08/13/2014 8:53:09 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
I do not have the luxury of throwing my vote away on write in candidates or third party candidates here.

I can sympathize with your problem - I lived in King County Washington for five years.

I would suggest that you vote your conscience. IMO a Republican candidate is not entitled to your vote just because he has an "R" behind his or her name. The candidate has to hold enough good positions on the issues to earn your vote. On a couple of occasions, I have withheld my vote for that reason (the latest being Mitt Romney).

I would not characterize a third-party vote as a wasted vote. It is a valid way to express frustration with the major party candidates. The major parties monitor the defections to the third-party candidates carefully for each knows that if the defections become large, the major party has a problem. One thing is for sure - nothing will change in the Republican Party if conservatives continue to hold their nose and vote for crappy general election candidates just because the candidate has an "R" behind the name.

I'd love to see the Republicans gain control of the Senate and increase the majority in the House but I'm not foolish enough to believe that it will have a dramatic impact on the nation's direction. It won't be the Nirvana that the straight-party-line advocates seem to suggest. You know what we will hear in 2016 if the Republicans gain control of both houses of Congress in 2014? As you have seen we can't be effective without holding the executive branch, therefore, you just have to hold your nose and vote for this less-than-perfect (but really far worse than that) GOPe candidate for POTUS. In 2018, it will be some other reason to compromise your conservative principles. In 2020, it will be something else and so on.

82 posted on 08/13/2014 8:54:48 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: duffee

You don’t need to be selective. Coulter is right. Vote GOP....unless....you can identify:

1) One Democrat US Senate candidate superior to the GOP candidate.

2) One Democrat gubernatorial candidate superior to the GOP candidate.

3) One Democrat congressional candidate superior to the GOP candidate.

If you can, please identify any such Democrat candidate for all to see.

Coulter is right. This isn’t rocket science. It’s politics. The choices are plain and simple as far as I as I can tell.


83 posted on 08/13/2014 8:55:21 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Years ago I asked what is the fascination with this shill? I have never liked her nor trusted her. It is all about promoting her books, which I admit proudly, I do not read.
___________________________________________________________

I like her, I like her very much. She has a hard hitting humor style that gets right at the point of the matter, using few words she says it all.

I read her books. Some are better than others but her research on single motherhood shocked me. Single motherhood has done more to hurt this country than anything I can think of. It has filled our prisons to overflowing and introduced a group of people with no social skills and no morals.

Nobody is perfect, she has a few ideas that differ from mine, but I dare say that most people do.


84 posted on 08/13/2014 8:55:46 AM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yeah... that clearly worked out well in 2012... (sarc)


85 posted on 08/13/2014 9:00:14 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

I DO vote my conscience. I have witnessed first hand how the Dems have destroyed my state. So I vote the straight GOP ticket.

I cannot speak for other states, but here in CA third parties rarely win more than a scant percentage of the vote and the candidates who represent these parties are gadflies and crackpots for the most part. It is basically a throw away vote here and I suspect the same is true in most other states as well.

If you happen to live in an overwhelmingly GOP state like Utah or Oklahoma for example, you might have the luxury (and fun) to vote third party every once and a while and it would make no difference. If you live in a blue state like mine or a swing state, it is simply not wise to waste your vote on anything for any reason.


86 posted on 08/13/2014 9:05:55 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

How was it under Ahh-nold?


87 posted on 08/13/2014 9:08:04 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
Perfect example of what happens to a state when you put the Dems in charge of everything.

Can't be, though. You've been voting (R) all this time. That has to count for something, right?

88 posted on 08/13/2014 9:09:33 AM PDT by dware (3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
No one said it was going to be easy. lol

Put another way, many of us have reached the same point as Hank Rearden in Atlas Shrugged. We have learned the lesson of Mississippi: GOPe's entire system is based on the knowledge that we will always continue voting in the general election for anyone with an "R", because Democrats are worse.

Numerous posters have tried to convince us to "suck it up" and get over our anger, because it's imperative that Harry Reid be relegated to Minority Leader in the Senate.

I've got news for you: the federal debt will continue its upward path with Mitch McConnell and John Boehner at the helm. Remember how they punted on sequestration? Just wait until the Chamber of Commerce comes to collect what's owed them for "destroying" their worst enemy, the Tea Party.

My vote has to be earned, I will no longer freely give it. I apologize to my children and grandson for not realizing this long ago.

89 posted on 08/13/2014 9:09:37 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
Adding a left-wing loony in Kentucky makes little sense, and that state could potentially re-elect her as they do not run from Democrats statewide. We don’t need 12-18 years of a leftie in what should be a solid GOP state - no matter how satisfying it would be to boot McConnell.

That's a tough trade-off to call.

It's quite possible that a solid red state will boot a "left-wing loony" who's in the minority in one cycle. I'm afraid of the serious damage that McConnell could do in control of the Senate. He's much more dangerous than a minor Democrat player. And... at his age this will possibly be his last term, so he may be legacy hunting, which puts his own agenda ahead of the party or the nation.

-PJ

90 posted on 08/13/2014 9:18:23 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I am tired of voting for enemies of the Republic, regardless of what letter they put after their name.

Amen to that! I'm voting conservative,straight down the line....no exceptions. That's where my heart is;my soul as well. If I have to write someone in, I will. I've had it with the GOP. Period.
91 posted on 08/13/2014 9:35:35 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Ann has become just another note in the political noise.

I have never failed to vote in my life; I don't intend to start now.

But I am increasingly voting for "Vladimir Putin" in every election when all the choices are no choice at all!

92 posted on 08/13/2014 10:05:25 AM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
well, as hard is it to say it, we do need the numbers - we need a veto proof Congress to get anything done.

In a sane world, that is superficially, well..., sane.

But I fail to see what benefit accrues from more of the same with different names and labels.

Getting things done for the sake of "doing something" is insanity, if nothing changes.

"Getting things done" in never an end in itself.
Just think where we might be if Obama got "everything done" that he wished to do for the last six years.

Yes, things could be worse. Hard to imagine perhaps, but since I feel that they can be worse, I will vote to obstruct.

Until something actually changes in politicians; even the "Tea Party" adherents.

93 posted on 08/13/2014 10:13:35 AM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
We have to control the Senate

There is no we, there is them and us, and the them use us, they do not like us.

94 posted on 08/13/2014 10:20:53 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
And we got Judas Roberts. Exactly. So my question is, what good will it do this time around? Believe me, I fought hard in 2000 for W and an (R) majority, and I was left holding the bag in the end. Nothing changed. If anything, it got worse, especially with traitorous judges and the treasonous patriot act. Really now, anyone who says you gotta vote (R) because they're not (D) is part of the problem, IMHO.
95 posted on 08/13/2014 10:23:01 AM PDT by dware (3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I will not presume to tell anyone else what to do with their precious vote, nor will I cast my ballot frivolously, but there comes a time when the only viable choice is "none of the above".

Nothing says 'none of the above' louder than writing in "Vladimir Putin!"

96 posted on 08/13/2014 10:23:42 AM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
When that Party is satisfied that it has sufficient power it will revert to a more primitive iteration and then the famine and the camps.

Bingo!

New World Order coming soon.

97 posted on 08/13/2014 10:33:38 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
Yeah... that clearly worked out well in 2012... (sarc)

120 million voters stayed home in 2012.

98 posted on 08/13/2014 10:36:32 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: raisetheroof

Staying home is not what gave you obama. You offered no choice. Socialist or socialist lite is not a choice.

If anything the GOPE is responsible totally for obama and the democrats setting the agenda since 1989. An echo is not a choice. You are just hoping the GOPE will hold off the tiger until you are the last one eaten instead of deciding screw the GOPE lets take them out as well as the tiger.


99 posted on 08/13/2014 10:37:32 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Got some bad news for you, Hannity isn’t a conservative, just listen to his positions on the issues.

Hannity is nothing but Hannity.
The only thing that matters is ratings numbers.

100 posted on 08/13/2014 10:50:50 AM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson