Skip to comments.
Video: Keith Ellison explains his vote against Iron Dome
Hot Air ^
| 8/3/14
| Jazz Shaw
Posted on 08/03/2014 4:32:45 PM PDT by Nachum
You may recall that on Friday, in what would have been a Christmas Miracle were it not several months early, Congress actually got something done. It was the passage of a bill approving $225M in funding for Israels Iron Dome defensive missile system. It was quite the bipartisan effort in retrospect, garnering an overwhelming 395 votes in the House with only eight in opposition. One of those eight was Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison, and as The Corner reports, he went out on the weekend gab circuit to explain why he didnt support the measure.
Because a cease-fire is what we should prioritize now, he said when asked to explain his vote on Meet the Press. A cease-fire protects civilians on both sides it doesnt just say, Were only concerned about people on one side.
He pointed to the devastation he witnessed during his trips to Gaza.
Lets go to the brief video, and then well carry on below that.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Kentucky; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota; US: North Carolina; US: South Carolina; US: Texas; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: antisemite; antisemitism; betoorourke; bleatthepress; california; democratscandals; dome; ellison; iron; irondome; islam; islamiclawmaker; jimmoran; justinamash; keith; keithellison; kentucky; lifeamongthekufir; marksanford; meetthepress; michigan; minnesota; nbc; northcarolina; southcarolina; teaparty; texas; thomasmassie; virginia; walterjones; zoelofgren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 last
To: 1010RD
81
posted on
08/05/2014 5:34:45 PM PDT
by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: robertwalker62
Why again are US taxpayers paying for this? The IDF can afford something like this.
1. Israel gives us technology.
2. The US has protected Hamas for 2 decades.
3. The US funds Hamas.
82
posted on
08/06/2014 10:34:48 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: Jane Long
83
posted on
08/06/2014 10:35:52 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: trisham
Im going to take a shot in the dark here and say that Ellison saw some logic in saying that voting against Iron Dome funding was a way of supporting a cease fire. Mind you, this is only a guess, but I suppose he meant that if large numbers of Israeli civilians began dying because the rockets raining down on them started getting through, Netanyahu?would be more interested in a cease fire? Was that it? No, Keith, you moron! Israel losing the Iron Dome would result in more dead wogs, not fewer.
Think about it: If the missiles keep falling, and the only way to stop them is at the source, then Netanyahu's rational response would be to loosen Israel's rules of engagement, resulting in more dead Gazan civilians. Netanyahu's one rational guy.
84
posted on
08/06/2014 10:50:29 PM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: rmlew
I didn’t know that. Thanks.
85
posted on
08/07/2014 5:30:44 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson