Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/27/2014 5:18:10 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ken H

All of a sudden “state’s rights” is cool.


2 posted on 07/27/2014 5:19:05 PM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H
So take it to the Article V convention and see how many states are willing to propose it, instead of getting Congress to propose it to force the states to not ratify it.

-PJ

3 posted on 07/27/2014 5:20:41 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

I am sick of the freedoms the government has stolen from us all to protect us from ourselves.


5 posted on 07/27/2014 5:24:35 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H
If it's completely legal anywhere and everywhere, the New York Times will read like Rolling Stone magazine. (Well, not that it doesn't already. But it will get even worse.)
8 posted on 07/27/2014 5:26:58 PM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

23.6 Billion ruling against tobacco, but pot is A-OK. Only in bizarro mondo.


9 posted on 07/27/2014 5:27:32 PM PDT by Calusa (Were going to have that person arrested.....that did the video, said Hillary Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

There’s an ulterior motive here. Stalinists like complacent, docile sheep. Hence the clarion call for legalizing marijuana.


10 posted on 07/27/2014 5:30:58 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

If the NY Times was intellectually honest, they would demand repeal of all gun laws too.


14 posted on 07/27/2014 5:45:58 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

The Central American Three Stooges told Barry that the American “appetite” for recreational drugs is drawing Central American “unaccompanied minors” to the U.S. like moths to a candle. If we legalize marijuana (and tax da hell out of it), every “unaccompanied minor” in Central America will be showing up at the border and declaring themselves a “refugee” or whatever the Spanish word for “refugee” is.


15 posted on 07/27/2014 5:47:28 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (America is not a refugee camp! It is my home!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

But don’t let the states decide on Obamacare or gay marriage.


16 posted on 07/27/2014 5:48:55 PM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

The reason they are pushing this is to get the liberal voters to show up for the next big election.


18 posted on 07/27/2014 5:59:24 PM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H; All
Regardless what FDR's activist justices wanted everybody to believe about the scope of Congress's Commerce Clause powers in Wickard v. Filburn , these corrupt justices wrongly ignored that a previous generation of Constitution-respecting justices had clarified that Congress actually has no constitutional authority to stick its big nose into intrastate commerce.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

In fact, FDR's justices also wrongly ignored that the Supreme Court had previously clarified that intrastate agriculture is an aspect of a state's intrastate commerce that Congress has no business regulating.

”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited. None to regulate agricultural production is given, and therefore legislation by Congress for that purpose is forbidden [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

So arguing that it's a “good idea” to let the states decide on intrastate marijuana production is beside the point, imo, since the federal government actually has no constitutional authority to regulate such things, interstate commerse being another issue.

On the other hand, noting that the 18th Amendment prohibiting booze was later repealed by the 21st Amendment, there's nothing stopping the states from amending the Constitution to make things like marijuana the federal government's business.

20 posted on 07/27/2014 6:05:25 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

Because Stoner Nation is just what we need in times of crisis. That would make our country so much better.


21 posted on 07/27/2014 6:18:30 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

“Repeal Prohibition, Again”

Again?

What amendment is he referring to? I am not aware of the amendment that gave this authority to FedZilla to begin with.


22 posted on 07/27/2014 6:33:00 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

Agreed.


24 posted on 07/27/2014 8:29:52 PM PDT by MarMema (Run Ted Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

Liberaltarians never change


25 posted on 07/27/2014 8:32:09 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ken H

Good idea, turn it over to the states to decide. And while they’re at it, turn the drinking age back to the states too. 21 is ridiculous, but that’s the age the Feds decided, not the states. Let the states decide without bribing them with highway funding, etc.

My suggestion: Age 19 or a high school diploma, whichever comes first.


28 posted on 07/27/2014 8:34:56 PM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson