Skip to comments.
Lois Lerner emails reveal
gaping open-records loophole
Washington Times ^
| 7/20/14
| S.A. Miller & Stephen Dinan
Posted on 07/20/2014 7:35:24 PM PDT by Nachum
The Lois G. Lerner emails released this month revealed a potentially huge loophole in federal open-records practices when an IRS tech staffer acknowledged that the agency doesnt regularly store and never checks instant message chats as official government records. Analysts say there is no question that the Internal Revenue Service and all other federal agencies should be storing chats and even cellphone text messages that may constitute official government documents, but a check by The Washington Times suggests that hardly any agency is doing so. Of 17 agencies surveyed by The Times, just two said they had policies
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: emails; irs; lerner; lois; loophole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
07/20/2014 7:35:24 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2
posted on
07/20/2014 7:35:43 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: Nachum
We no longer have a government that is answerable to anyone.
3
posted on
07/20/2014 7:37:57 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: Nachum
Only Republicans are required to follow those laws, silly.
4
posted on
07/20/2014 7:40:19 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: Nachum
I’m in the Securities business. FINRA requires such retention. There is no way this is an oversight.
5
posted on
07/20/2014 7:42:13 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: Nachum
govt bureaucrats warning each other about how to avoid Congressional oversight!! Decent, honest, accountable govt officials would be concerned with how to create the most accurate and comprehensive records for oversight and future planning. Instead, Lerner and friends are concerned only with how to avoid scrutiny of their politicized, dishonest activities....
[emphasis added] I was cautioning folks about email and how we have had several occasions where Congress has asked for emails and there has been an electronic search for responsive emails so we need to be cautious about what we say in emails, Ms. Lerner wrote.
6
posted on
07/20/2014 7:47:05 PM PDT
by
Enchante
To: Blood of Tyrants
P> Bingo! The slave has become the master. What was the original Boston Tea Party of 1773 about? It was about a 4-cent tax on tea. FOUR CENTS! 4 cents for those in the low information crowd. Look where we are now. And you wonder why the slave has become the master and refuses any and all attempts to take that power away? The IRS is above the law--it IS the law. No! Not in my book.
7
posted on
07/20/2014 7:48:27 PM PDT
by
Fungi
To: Nachum
Doesn’t sound as much like a loophole as it does a wilful circumvention of the law.
To: pgyanke
absolutely no way there are any oversights about such policies and practices for huge sensitive govt. bureaucracies
even smallish pvt. companies of 25 employees are aware of the various document and records issues
No remotely competent manager or IT person does not know what the issues and options are. For the IRS to fail to retain records while permitting employees to utilize these modes of communication is mind-boggling.... oh, but not surprising!
9
posted on
07/20/2014 7:53:56 PM PDT
by
Enchante
To: hometoroost
I'll look into this right away"
10
posted on
07/20/2014 7:54:17 PM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill ...)
To: Nachum
The SEC and IRS requires companies to log and store all email and text communications.
Rules for thee and not for me.
11
posted on
07/20/2014 8:00:50 PM PDT
by
uncommonsense
(Liberals see what they believe; Conservatives believe what they see.)
To: pgyanke
“Im in the Securities business. FINRA requires such retention. There is no way this is an oversight.”
Being somewhat familiar with the high levels of scrutiny in that business, I’d like you to expound on what would happen to you (personally) as well as what would happen to your employer if you did a “Lois Lerner” at work.
12
posted on
07/20/2014 8:28:22 PM PDT
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
To: Nachum
13
posted on
07/20/2014 9:10:21 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(Resist in place.)
To: pgyanke
....There is no way this is an oversight....
I agree, but this is going in the wrong direction. Most if not all of Lerner’s data that was on her crashed hard drive was stored, including her emails. If they weren’t, tell me how she was able to continue day to day operations with a new blank hard drive with none of her old data on it? No one in a position as high as hers would be able to continue functioning. No files, no emails.
She would be a lost soul sitting alone in her office staring at a blank computer screen.
I will bet her computer, if it did in deed crash, was up and running that very day with all her old data reloaded. Thats why you have an IT department. Its happened to me and all data was able to be reloaded effortlessly.
To: Nachum
Whats legal is what Holder says is legal...
15
posted on
07/20/2014 10:33:21 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: Nachum
When are we going to hear from IRS techs who actually understand how their backup system works, and know whether or not IRS IM traffic can be traced.
Just because Lerner's email and IM data is not on her computer does not mean it is not on other computers.
16
posted on
07/21/2014 12:39:14 AM PDT
by
TChad
(The Obamacare motto: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
To: TChad
They already have her emails and contact lists from before and after the crash. Use that to create a list of people with whom she corresponded.
Subpoena those contacts to turn over all emails sent by or received by those contacts with Lois Lerner
17
posted on
07/21/2014 3:33:53 AM PDT
by
ozdragon
To: Nachum
It’s not a “loophole” it’s criminal obviscation of the law.
18
posted on
07/21/2014 4:12:37 AM PDT
by
VTenigma
(The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: VTenigma
19
posted on
07/21/2014 4:24:23 AM PDT
by
Mycroft Holmes
(The fool is always greater than the proof.)
To: pgyanke
Im in the Securities business. FINRA requires such retention. There is no way this is an oversight.It seems impossible that it's an oversight...
20
posted on
07/21/2014 7:36:45 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize-Voltaire)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson