Replies

In every article about Walker, I notice you come on with your immigration rebuff. Do you understand the difference between legal and illegal immigration? Even the articles you cite use the term legal immigration. My son-in-law is a legal immigrant.
When you make such a blatant mistake as saying that his wife is Mexican, it is hard to trust anything else you write. Are you supporting Rand Paul? (You might want to research the last name Tonino.)

No, I don’t support Rand Paul and I have no idea what you’re getting at with that.

Yes, I understand the difference between legal and illegal immigration—as does, I’d reckon, the vast majority of the country. The articles I cite involve both illegals over here already and Walkers’ ideas to expand immigration such that everyone in the future can come here legally. Neither they nor I have confused the two and it is inaccurate for you to claim that they address only illegal immigration or that I have somehow confused the two.

Walker wants to make illegals already here citizens, and he wants to do away by future illegal immigration by making everyone who wants to come here easily and automatically legal.

Both of those positions are killers to this country, IMO. Although Walker has apparently been a very good governor for WI, I believe he would be a country-killer as president. Most Freepers even don’t seem to understand his immigration position, which I think is relevant to any discussion here about his potential as a presidential candidate. Better that the truth be out and understood early than late or not at all.

Now, he does have some supporters and likely staffers who eventually come on every thread here about him. They call me names and claim that every single quote from Walker on amnesty has been a misquote and none of the numerous press articles out there are accurate, because they are from the ‘MSM’. I actually think there venom and attempts to deceive do him more harm than good.