1 posted on
07/05/2014 7:18:28 PM PDT by
shove_it
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: shove_it
Is it going to be crewed by Somali ragheads?
53 posted on
07/05/2014 10:51:31 PM PDT by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
To: shove_it
7.5-million-pound littoral combat ship, Suprisingly good value for money. The Brits expect to pay up to 350 million pounds for their Global Combatant Ship.
54 posted on
07/05/2014 11:01:24 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Wikipedia is wrong. who knew?)
To: shove_it
The USN should let it patrol the Great Lakes. One can never discount the possibility of rogue third world pirates roaming the back bays of Lake Huron.
59 posted on
07/06/2014 3:02:46 AM PDT by
Artie
(We are surrounded by MORONS)
To: shove_it
This class of ships
"is a one-size-fits all weapons platform which, like the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, has a tendency to become one-size-fits-none. Having a single weapons platform perform multiple, radically distinct missions means the weapon will have to compromise its ability to do one job well in order to do multiple jobs poorly. This Swiss Army knife approach provides weapons that will be mediocre at a lot of things; and while mediocrity is not typically a mortal sin, it can be fatal in 21st century warfare. I've been reading bad things about this class of ships for a few years now. She is a waste of money that will get her crew killed in combat.
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-new-littoral-combat-ships-updated-01343/
64 posted on
07/06/2014 6:53:05 AM PDT by
jpsb
(Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson