Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Unam Sanctam

I think about how the GOP-e leadership on the Hill has blasted Tea Party conservatives and the “up-start” “meddling” “outside” “fringe” groups that support them.

Makes you think real hard about who you contribute to - when you read Jeffrey Lord’s list - contributors who give with ease to both the GOP-e and the Dems.

I have to conclude that the “outside” groups don’t want their donations going into a GOP-e/Dem political slush fund, but rather to support true Tea Party conservatives.

It also makes me think real hard about why elected Republicans refuse to campaign against an incumbent in the primary - it would seem that the GOP-e doesn’t want to dip into that slush fund, if they don’t have to.


21 posted on 07/03/2014 6:32:12 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Cincinatus' Wife
Another thing that's appalling is the names they've given some of these groups. A lot of people donating to these groups think conservative means constitutional conservative "tea party" candidates.

The only answer is to donate to individual candidates, using recommendations of groups as guidance but doing ones own research.

The one group I do trust is NumbersUSA. They're one-issue EVerify and stopping illegals from getting to and being in the US. I suspect their 100% rating to Brat has more to do with his victory than the ptb want to admit.

28 posted on 07/03/2014 6:54:25 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson