Skip to comments.
The Texans: Rick Perry Or Ted Cruz For 2016?
Townhall ^
| 07/01/2014
| Matt Mackowiak |
Posted on 07/01/2014 9:48:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: precisionshootist
One citizen parent born on foreign soil? No need to cite anything. Simple logic tells us Cruz is not a NBC. Do you think a person born in Saudi Arabia and raised under sharia law would be an NBC simply cause the father was a US citizen? Do u think thats what the founders intended?
No, your understanding and desire for it to mean 2 parents is what forms your OPINION that Cruz is not an NBC.
There is no constitutional authority that backs up your opinion.
61
posted on
07/01/2014 3:05:06 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: itsahoot; bgill; SeekAndFind
Because the Court has not issued a definitive opinion, does not give you the right to infer one.
I'm assuming that you meant that post for me.
However, whomever it is meant for, there is no constitutionally defined definition for "Natural Born" that includes either tangentially, and especially unambiguously, 2 US citizens at birth.
62
posted on
07/01/2014 3:10:25 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: RIghtwardHo
Well Perry is just stupid. I am not a real fan of Cruz and he is unelectable.
Thanks for mimicking the GOP-E and the Lamestream press for us.
Frankly, if Ted Cruz is unelectable, we should start CWII right now, because no conservative is electable and this country is finished.
That being said, you can go ahead and be a surrender monkey, I think I'll fight to my last breath to resolve our problems through the legal process before picking up my gun.
63
posted on
07/01/2014 3:21:49 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SeekAndFind
64
posted on
07/01/2014 3:22:26 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: CyberAnt
I’d select Cruz for Attorney General....not President.
To: Sacajaweau
I’d rather have Cruz on the Supreme Court.
66
posted on
07/01/2014 4:01:39 PM PDT
by
Thud
To: Sacajaweau
Yeah, that’s a good choice.
The reason I would select Cruz is that he’s not afraid of the left. He’s not dismayed or cowed by anything the left does or says. What the left does and says does not change what he believes.
HE IS FEARLESS. He has a steel spine; he’s a God worshiping, America loving patriot.
67
posted on
07/01/2014 5:45:05 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(True the Vote: MY AMERICA, "... I'm terrified it's slipping away.")
To: SoConPubbie
"One citizen parent born on foreign soil? No need to cite anything. Simple logic tells us Cruz is not a NBC. Do you think a person born in Saudi Arabia and raised under sharia law would be an NBC simply cause the father was a US citizen? Do u think thats what the founders intended? No, your understanding and desire for it to mean 2 parents is what forms your OPINION that Cruz is not an NBC. There is no constitutional authority that backs up your opinion. "
First, I did not say anything about my desire for NBC to mean 2 parents. I stated what is clearly NOT a natural born citizen.
I also noticed you dodged the question so I will ask again. Would a person born in Saudi Arabia and raised under sharia law be considered a Natural born citizen if the father was a US citizen? Do you think this was the founders intent when they wrote the NBC requirement? (Keep in mind this could mean the child was fathered by a one night stand with a mother he knew nothing about)
Last I will fully retort your statement of "there is no constitutional authority that backs up my opinion". The fact is the Constitution itself backs my opinion as it clearly states you must be a Natural Born Citizen.
Ted Cruz was born in a foreign country to only one US citizen parent. There is simply no logical way this would meet the definition of NBC.
To: SeekAndFind; BereanBrain; fieldmarshaldj; TADSLOS; Pelham; F15Eagle; bobby.223; Norm Lenhart; ...
There are actually FReepers who would choose Governor Mumbles, La Raza Rick Perry over Ted Cruz?!
Just wow.
69
posted on
07/02/2014 1:23:25 AM PDT
by
South40
(Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
To: Proud_texan
I might add that I've spoken to him on several occasions and the man just isn't smartlol! Ouch!
I have never spoken to him but I have heard him speak. The man is an embarrassment.
70
posted on
07/02/2014 1:24:48 AM PDT
by
South40
(Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
To: freedomfiter2
Perry can’t be VP....Pres and VP cannot be from same state.
To: South40
RE: La Raza Rick Perry
Do you know what Ted Cruz’s policy is regarding how to solve the problem of illegal immigration?
To: South40
“Cuz, y’know, Cruz is more needed in the Senate than as President !” =Perrybot talking point=
To: precisionshootist
I also noticed you dodged the question so I will ask again. Would a person born in Saudi Arabia and raised under sharia law be considered a Natural born citizen if the father was a US citizen? Do you think this was the founders intent when they wrote the NBC requirement? (Keep in mind this could mean the child was fathered by a one night stand with a mother he knew nothing about)
The founders put in a system of laws, period.
It is not a system of opinions, or what I want it to be.
It is not a system of my understanding or your understanding of what the founders meant.
With regards to your question, yes, that person, under current US Law is considered "Natural Born". You and I might not like it, but until you, I, or some other interested US Citizen either files a lawsuit that makes it to SCOTUS, or a US Law is passed by Congress and signed by a US President, or we follow the constitutional requirements for amending the constitution to define "Natural Born" as requiring 2 US Citizens at birth, that person is considered by current US Law as "Natural Born".
Your opinion, my opinion, and even the opinions of the Founders do not matter at this point in time with respect to actual constitutionality until one of those three paths are executed to make your opinion, my opinion, or what we understand as the opinions of the founders a matter of constitutional LAW.
74
posted on
07/02/2014 9:17:49 AM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: South40
75
posted on
07/02/2014 9:28:04 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: SeekAndFind
in-state tuition!
Can’t be heartless and send them home now, can we?
76
posted on
07/02/2014 9:29:18 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: SoConPubbie; bgill; SeekAndFind
there is no constitutionally defined definition for "Natural Born" You keep saying that, I along with many others disagree. The issue on this forum is dead because Jim has endorsed Cruz, so I no longer argue the issue, there is nothing to be gained, unless these threads are just honeypots to attract those that disagree with you into committing a ZOT offense.
In any case, unless she converts to Islam, I will write in Sarah Palin for President no matter who is on the ballot.
77
posted on
07/02/2014 10:00:49 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
To: itsahoot; bgill; SeekAndFind
You keep saying that, I along with many others disagree.
You can disagree until the cows come home, but you are still wrong.
As of right now, July 2nd, 2014, there is NO constitutional requirement, no legal requirement that defines "Natural Born" as requiring 2 US Citizen parents at birth. None, period.
You and I may agree/disagree as to the INTENT of the founders, but as of now, the law is what it is.
If you want the current legal definition of "Natural Born" to be more in line with your opinions, you will either have to amend the constitution, pass a new law, or get SCOTUS to agree with you.
Those are your options.
78
posted on
07/02/2014 10:16:28 AM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SeekAndFind
Do you know what Ted Cruzs policy is regarding how to solve the problem of illegal immigration?Cruz's policy in the short term is to defeat the liberal/Republican elite plan to grant amnesty to these lawbreakers. People like La Raza Rick Perry, Karl Rove et al are part of the problem and thus, are far from being the solution. Cruz opposes that, which should earn him the support of all conservatives.
So what is La Raza Ricks policy...to continue giving taxpayer-subsidized handouts to ILLEGAL aliens and labeling as heartless conservatives who doesn't agree?
On the issue of illegal immigration Perry's pro-ILLEGAL alien record precludes him from any serious consideration.
79
posted on
07/02/2014 10:42:06 AM PDT
by
South40
(Hillary Clinton was a "great secretary of state". - Texas Governor Rick Perry)
To: South40
Perry is a good choice for RINO dream ticket. Perry and Christie.
Twiddle Dee and Twiddle Dum.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson