[itsahoot]

there is no constitutionally defined definition for "Natural Born"

You keep saying that, I along with many others disagree. The issue on this forum is dead because Jim has endorsed Cruz, so I no longer argue the issue, there is nothing to be gained, unless these threads are just honeypots to attract those that disagree with you into committing a ZOT offense.

In any case, unless she converts to Islam, I will write in Sarah Palin for President no matter who is on the ballot.

[SoConPubbie]

You keep saying that, I along with many others disagree.

You can disagree until the cows come home, but you are still wrong.

As of right now, July 2nd, 2014, there is NO constitutional requirement, no legal requirement that defines "Natural Born" as requiring 2 US Citizen parents at birth. None, period.

You and I may agree/disagree as to the INTENT of the founders, but as of now, the law is what it is.

If you want the current legal definition of "Natural Born" to be more in line with your opinions, you will either have to amend the constitution, pass a new law, or get SCOTUS to agree with you.

Those are your options.