From what I have seen, while possible, the lilely hood is not probable.
There was evidence of voters that voted in the Dem primary were turned away and not allowed to vote in the Runoff.
True, that. There is a news report that names a woman who was turned away for just that. At the same time, there are reports that there is evidence of 1,000 voters who voted in the DEM primary and GOP runoff. That makes those votes invalid in the GOP runoff.
It would be unusual if all the evidence swung in one direction. There are more than a quarter million votes, and it would be odd indeed if all the irregularities swung n one direction, or if all the attempts at irregular voting resulted in an invalid ballot being cast.
Whether Dem voters got to vote in the GOP run-off or not was probably a function of the election procedures of the particular county in which they were registered. If MS is like the rest of the places I’ve lived, some counties are very careful to check information, some aren’t.
I’m not sure how many irregular voters he actually needs to prove. The margin of victory was about 6,000 votes in the run-off. I don’t know if that means he has to prove 12,000 votes were illegal (because theoretically, the illegal votes could have gone either way) or just find enough to prove that the election was seriously tainted by the illegal votes and thus get it thrown out.