Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Alter Kaker
Is the alarm loud enough yet?
2 posted on
06/25/2014 10:08:05 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Alter Kaker
And the Marxist tsunami continues unabated. America may be well and truly finished.
but remember
“Just elect more Republicans!”
lol
3 posted on
06/25/2014 10:08:16 AM PDT by
Viennacon
(Rebuke the Repuke!)
To: Alter Kaker
The Supreme Court really opened the flood gates on this one. Their decisions last year were poorly constructed and seemed to just parrot the far left. They gave every judge the ability to strike down any law regardless of the merit or the will of the people.
5 posted on
06/25/2014 10:10:29 AM PDT by
ilgipper
To: Alter Kaker
If only we had elected Romney, he would have stood against such evil.
6 posted on
06/25/2014 10:11:34 AM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: Alter Kaker
These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. No. A family by definition requires a man and woman to produce children. You can't take away gender or orientation. Its intrinsic with being human.
11 posted on
06/25/2014 10:14:32 AM PDT by
Count of Monte Fisto
(The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
To: Alter Kaker
“These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. The Constitution demands that we treat them as such.”
oh now theres some sound reasoning.......
14 posted on
06/25/2014 10:16:11 AM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
To: Alter Kaker
These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street When a qualifier is necessary to make your case... you have no case.
17 posted on
06/25/2014 10:16:53 AM PDT by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: Alter Kaker
These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street.Which street would that be?
To: Alter Kaker
The states should just exert their 10th amendment rights ant tell FedGov to pound sand... /s
24 posted on
06/25/2014 10:26:22 AM PDT by
bfh333
("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
To: Alter Kaker
And our spineless Republican leaders do and say nothing.
29 posted on
06/25/2014 10:39:18 AM PDT by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
To: Alter Kaker
This is what the Republicans get for rarely opposing the judicial nominees of Democrats. I will never forgive the RINOs for approving Ruth Bader Ginsburg 96-3. McConnell, McCain and Hatch all voted for her.
To: Alter Kaker
The Constitution does NOT demand what this intellectually poor judge has ruled.
Stand against this crap, Pence. We have a 10th amendment for a REASON.
To: Alter Kaker
Polygamy is just around the corner!
34 posted on
06/25/2014 10:54:19 AM PDT by
golf lover
(goingf)
To: Alter Kaker
It’s time for a revolution. An honest-to-God Lexington and Concord, shooting revolution.
37 posted on
06/25/2014 11:26:07 AM PDT by
DesScorp
To: Alter Kaker
So THAT’S what the Republicans in Congress in 1868 intended. Clever, clever.
38 posted on
06/25/2014 11:38:31 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
To: Alter Kaker
Warp speed! Losing this country at warp speed!
To: Alter Kaker
You can put a cat in the oven, but that doesn't make it chocolate cake.
Likewise two faggots exchanging rings, saying words, and engaging in sodomy don't make it "marriage."
44 posted on
06/25/2014 5:25:25 PM PDT by
Repeat Offender
(While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy saints surrounded.)
To: Alter Kaker
so does that also discriminate against two wives too, after all equality for all bla bla
45 posted on
06/25/2014 5:41:50 PM PDT by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Alter Kaker
The Supreme Judge rejects “gay marriage”, a modern invention of flawed mortals.
To: Alter Kaker
"These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. The Constitution demands that we treat them as such." Really? I see nowhere in the Constitution where it says the definition of words must be ignored. "When gender is taken away" - well you can't do that. Husband is a male. Wife is a female. No marriage without a husband and a wife. It's reality. The judge must explain how a woman can be a husband, and a man can be a wife, to justify this ruling. Is anyone filing briefs in these cases even making this most basic argument?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson