[HiTech RedNeck]

Is the alarm loud enough yet?

[Viennacon]

And the Marxist tsunami continues unabated. America may be well and truly finished.

but remember

“Just elect more Republicans!”

lol

[ilgipper]

The Supreme Court really opened the flood gates on this one. Their decisions last year were poorly constructed and seemed to just parrot the far left. They gave every judge the ability to strike down any law regardless of the merit or the will of the people.

[freedomfiter2]

If only we had elected Romney, he would have stood against such evil.

[Count of Monte Fisto]

These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street.

No. A family by definition requires a man and woman to produce children. You can't take away gender or orientation. Its intrinsic with being human.

[MeshugeMikey]

“These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. The Constitution demands that we treat them as such.”

oh now theres some sound reasoning.......

[grobdriver]

These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street

When a qualifier is necessary to make your case... you have no case.

[madprof98]

These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street.

Which street would that be?

[bfh333]

The states should just exert their 10th amendment rights ant tell FedGov to pound sand... /s

[stinkerpot65]

And our spineless Republican leaders do and say nothing.

[Tom Cullen]

This is what the Republicans get for rarely opposing the judicial nominees of Democrats. I will never forgive the RINOs for approving Ruth Bader Ginsburg 96-3. McConnell, McCain and Hatch all voted for her.

[SoFloFreeper]

The Constitution does NOT demand what this intellectually poor judge has ruled.

Stand against this crap, Pence. We have a 10th amendment for a REASON.

[golf lover]

Polygamy is just around the corner!

[DesScorp]

It’s time for a revolution. An honest-to-God Lexington and Concord, shooting revolution.

[Dr. Sivana]

So THAT’S what the Republicans in Congress in 1868 intended. Clever, clever.

[Road Warrior ‘04]

Warp speed! Losing this country at warp speed!

[Repeat Offender]

You can put a cat in the oven, but that doesn't make it chocolate cake.

Likewise two faggots exchanging rings, saying words, and engaging in sodomy don't make it "marriage."

[manc]

so does that also discriminate against two wives too, after all equality for all bla bla

[windsorknot]

The Supreme Judge rejects “gay marriage”, a modern invention of flawed mortals.

[Republican Wildcat]

"These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. The Constitution demands that we treat them as such."

Really? I see nowhere in the Constitution where it says the definition of words must be ignored. "When gender is taken away" - well you can't do that. Husband is a male. Wife is a female. No marriage without a husband and a wife. It's reality. The judge must explain how a woman can be a husband, and a man can be a wife, to justify this ruling. Is anyone filing briefs in these cases even making this most basic argument?