Posted on 06/18/2014 7:07:10 AM PDT by kristinn
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has canceled the Washington Redskins trademark registration, calling the football team’s name “disparaging to Native Americans.”
The landmark case, which appeared before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, was filed on behalf of five Native Americans. It was the second time such a case was filed.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Now, 55 years later, his comment is still terribly apt. That this is an idiotic effort at thought control, will not make it less a subject for celebration by those who seek to outlaw the actual realities of human existence. (I could start with the fact that calling members of Indian nations, "Native Americans," actually insults their heritage, but realize that that thought is over the heads of most of the compulsion driven collectivist/egalitarians who will be doing the celebrating of this arbitrary & capricious denial of trade mark protection.)
William Flax
Earlier this year, Sauk Rapids satirist Dan McCall won a legal victory over the federal government after National Security Agency reps tried to get online retailers to stop selling shirts emblazoned with the the agency's seal and slogans like this: "The NSA: The only part of government that actually listens." The NSA essentially claimed their logo is copyrighted and couldn't be used without permission, an argument that didn't pass muster in light of the First Amendment's protection of satire. Now, a pro-Hillary Clinton group is making a version of that same argument to once again get McCall's products pulled from stores. (McCall also sells his shirts on his own site, LibertyManiacs.com.) http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2014/06/satirist_dan_mccall_battles_hillary_clinton_pac_over_ready_for_oligarchy_design_images.php Leftists always want to ban things they don't approve of.
What about the Browns? Can’t just go around calling people Browns!
This is what a dictator looks like.
Last week the Marxist visited an Indian reservation, this week the Marxist seizes the assets of a privately owned company. Both to suit his political goals.
We are Venezuela.
This is one of the few cases where the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, since the case it Federal, and it should go there.
What's embarrassing is the amateurish quality of the Democratic revolutionaries.
Takings Clause
Careful, the name may not be trademarked, but you can be sure the logo still is.
The Washington Redskins franchise is going to be hounded until they cave and change the name.
Those opposed to the name/logo/trademark have tasted blood [support from various governmental entities]. They will pursue this relentlessly. That is how they operate. As soon as they get what they want, they will find something else to be offended by.
Regrettably, the question is no longer ‘will the Redskins management concede’ but ‘when will the Redskins management concede?’
The PC crowd, all 5 of them in this case, win.
How about when every fan in the stadium at Atlanta Braves games are doing the tomahawk chop and singing the war cry, or whatever it is?
Tempest in a teapot:
‘Native Americans have won at this stage before, in 1999. But the team and the NFL won an appeal to federal court in 2009. The court did not rule on the merits of the case, however, but threw it out, saying that the plaintiffs didn’t have standing to file it. The team is likely to make the same appeal this time. Team officials are expected to make a statement this morning.
‘Robert Raskopf, a lawyer who has been representing the team since the first case was filed in 1992, was not concerned about the ruling.
‘“We’ve seen this story before,” he said. “And just like last time, today’s ruling will have no effect at all on the team’s ownership of and right to use the Redskins name and logo.
‘“We are confident we will prevail once again, and that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s divided ruling will be overturned on appeal. This case is no different than an earlier case, where the Board cancelled the Redskins’ trademark registrations, and where a federal district court disagreed and reversed the Board.”’
I would think that the Redskins could take a casualty tax deduction in the mid-single-digit billions of dollars for this “taking”. It is unprecedented.
Exactly. WTF?
We now have feral government.
The only rules are that you must submit.
Thanks for the reference to LibertyManiacs.com. They have some great stuff.
I think the “Irony is Jackson On a Central Bank Note Poster” would confuse most folks.
King Obama, the lord and master of all things, gives them the authority. There's no one who will stand in his way.
IIRC,Rush had a comment on this situation a week or two ago that was insightful........
Exactly. And it’s based on a whim and something subjective like it’s “offensive.” Are the San Diego Padres offensive to Athiests? GI Joe with the Kung Fu grip offensive to Chinese pacifists? Where does it end? Completely Orwellian move. Snyder has to take this to court.
outrageous government/obama abuse of power.
So is Notre Dame’s Fighting Irish next?
The whiners over the Redskins’ name haven’t fought this through. Naming a sports team after American Indians is “clearly” racist but naming a team after a bunch of white people isn’t. By favoring whites over Indians, they’re being racist.
The first thing I did, was look for his name. It would not surprise me, however. Look at all the other things the Obungler administration has gotten away with. They probably ordered them to do this.
Kansas City Chiefs, Chicago Blackhawks. Don't forget all the state, county and city names, that come from Indian words (maybe I can't say that either) will need to be changed. We can't disparage any of them, right? /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.