Please. Not in my lifetime.
Posted on 06/15/2014 5:10:43 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
Mitt Romney -or-
Hillary Clinton
Elizabeth Warren
Joe Biden
The above three continue the destruction of America as Obama has started.
Not in my voting both.
It is against his nature to be bold.
Please. Not in my lifetime.
What will being branded a "two time loser for life" do for him?
I've heard that it's Ann Romney who is pushing him for another run. She must really want to be First Lady.
This site exists to advance conservative politics.
You are here to counter that goal.
As we can see, no matter when, even outside of actual primaries, you always push the same move to liberalism.
You miscounted. Should read “The above FOUR”.
You're avoiding the question. Why are you comparing Romney, a liberal, to Reagan, a conservative?
Reagan challenged the GOP establishment for the nomination and the power structure won. Romney IS the GOP establishment; he had the nomination and still couldn't manage to win. Your comparison doesn't hold water.
"Hillary Clinton
Elizabeth Warren
Joe Biden
The above three continue the destruction of America as Obama has started.
Not in my voting both."
What you refuse to see is that amnesty enacted by one of those you listed above, or by a moderate/liberal Republican like Romney or Jeb Bush, is the death knell of the country, regardless of the D or the R after the name. Support for abortion and for the rights of sick perverts to adopt and abuse children is every bit as evil and toxic, regardless of who's behind it---Hillary or Romney, it doesn't matter.
Yet you willfully ignore the words and the record of your liberal hero, Romney. You think he would somehow be an improvement over a Democrat, despite the factual evidence that he is no different.
If you want to lend your support to the destruction of the US by voting for an amnesty supporter, or if you're not worried about having to stand before Jesus and explain your support for an abortionist and a pervert lover, go ahead. But don't be surprised when conservatives refuse to do so.
People like you are part of the problem...I know some of you. You exist in a blind world where an R behind the name automatically means "good guy." So you continue getting behind these miserable, moderate-to-liberal loser Republicans, which empowerers the GOP establishment to keep playing you like a fool, knowing you'll vote for whomever they push on you.
I won't vote for another liberal. Sadly, I guess your mileage varies.
In order .. hell no, no, no, no, absolutely not and are you kidding?
Romney once worried he'd be branded a "loser for life" by his party if he failed to unseat the president, but it hasn't quite worked out that way.
True. Conservatives knew Mutt was a loser long before he ever ran for President.
They cannot point to a single conservative action by the guy. Not one.
and they are here arguing with conservatives and upset that we will not vote for him.
Not a single conservative action folks. they cannot point to a single conservative action. How is that ANY DIFFERENT from a liberal promoting a Democrat? In fact many Democrats have proven records with conservative positions, votes, actions in them. Even Barry and Hillary have Pro traditional marriage on their side. How pathetic does it get to support a guy that can’t even match Barak Obama for conservatism?
Not Romney.
Funny. Pretzel logic with a few extra twists. Have a good day. And yes, you win.
There you go. Don’t respond-—run.
If Mitt runs I vote for him or the Republican nominee.
Notice that their “arguments” often consist of one or two sentences. I haven’t seen any responses to direct questions about Mitt’s policy stances. Have I missed anything?
Nope, you missed nothing. there never were or are direct answers. There is questioning of patriotism, accusations, namecalling, avoidance and lots of MSNBC (literally) talking points...but no answers to direct questions. Which shows you the integrity possessed by the average GOP sycophant.
What about Reagan?
He’s trying to rehash the lost but then won thing.
Mitt would be lying if he came out like you wish.
Mitt whorships at the Alter of State Power.
Mitt, above all, believes the State is the ideal.
Mitt has no respect for individual liberty and our Constitution.
Reagan won after being defeated
Does your enthusiasm for voting for Romney in 2016 explain why you wouldn’t respond to my post 87 to you?
To learn something about Reagan versus Romney read posts 60 and 73.
Do you read our posts at all?
Give it up already. I stated my position: I vote for Romney or the Republican nominee. End of debate. You guys gave us Obama, and I want no part of that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.