Posted on 06/15/2014 5:10:43 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
Welcome to freerepublic, you almost sound like a retread.
What was in post 199 that drew that frivolous, and hostile avoidance? Does a simple question about Romney and an explanation to clear up your ignorance about Reagan call for that?
You refuse to respond to post 87, and you refuse to respond to history on Reagan and Romney after repeatedly using him in your liberal arguments.
If you are a nooby that refuses to respond to posts and engage with the conservatives here, then why sign up and post?
Get the person that you support nominated to the head of the Republican ticket and that person has my vote. It’s really easy to understand.
Since you just signed up, and are an instant and heavy poster yet refuse to respond to conservative posters, you really do look like a retread, a rather liberal one.
Please, for your own sanity, have the administrator delete my account. If it makes you happy it will make me happy. I vote for Romney or the nominated person at the top of the Republican ticket.
Why won’t you just respond to posts like post 87 which was relevant to your Romney promoting and a direct question addressed to you, or 60 and 73 which are related to your ignorance of Reagan and specifically addressed your comparing Romney to Reagan?
Why instead keep lashing out with snarky posts?
When a guy who has only been here 3 weeks is already raging at people avoiding some posters, and appearing to already have some personal hostility to others, he sure looks like a retread.
admin, this person seems to have a huge isse with me and in particular the fact that I will not engage in a debate that we both already know the outcome. Therefore, please remove my account because I did not come here for this. Thanks and good luck.
A poster’s opinions are relevant-—the sign up date isn’t.
.
Post 87 has nothing to do with debate, and I’m not here to debate, and FR isn’t a debate site
The way you promote Romney and use Reagan, while avoiding our responses to your posts, indicates that you are here to sell something, something that we don’t want.
In this case his sign up date is relevant, and it reinforces the suspicion that he is a retread.
The authentic quote is supposed to be.
“National Review will support the rightward most viable candidate.”
“At National Review today, there’s an interesting piece of history from Neal Freeman, who was present at the creation of the “Buckley Rule” by William F. himself at an NR meeting in 1964, when the magazine decided to editorially endorse Barry Goldwater over Nelson Rockefeller (who, believe it or not, had support on the magazine’s board). According to Freeman, the exact formulation of the “Buckley Rule” was: “National Review will support the rightwardmost viable candidate.” But Buckley had a somewhat different way of interpreting “viable” than does Rove:
We all knew what “viable” meant in Bill’s lexicon. It meant somebody who saw the world as we did. Somebody who would bring credit to our cause. Somebody who, win or lose, would conservatize the Republican party and the country. It meant somebody like Barry Goldwater.”
It can be. I've been posting for only three years, but when I see someone pushing the queer agenda or something similar, I hover over the name, and most of the time the signup date will be 2013 or 2014.
“So just who do you think he would have been a Good president for? “
“good” is a relative and subjective term. Romney would have been a much better president than BO, but there are those here who are hung up on his religion, and will make all sorts of excuses as to why they didn’t support his candidacy, resulting in the current mess we have. well you got your wish and Romney didn’t win, and now America must suffer the consequences. However, i must agree that Romney would be a huge mistake if we hope to defeat Hillary in 2016.
‘The way you promote Romney and use Reagan, while avoiding our responses to your posts, indicates that you are here to sell something, something that we don’t want.’
Are you speaking for all Freepers? have they elected you to be the judge, jury and executioner for this site? if someone holds a differing opinion than you about Romney, but will support whomever is the GOP 2016 nominee, who are you to suggest that they don’t belong here? will we be asked to genuflect to you in future posts?
Which liberal are you trying to push for 2016?
Or are you just trying to soften us up for any liberal that emerges?
!!! LOL!! Yep. I think you got ol’ Wave nailed! {^)
AMEN.
What you say is absolutely true.
When the Republican party nominates for president of America -- a Republican -- who acts in lockstep with the Democrat agenda in expanding government control and power over every aspect of our lives ---
Is it realistic to think the Republican party would kick Romney out on his ear the same way the Democrat party would kick out Ted Cruz if he switched parties and attempted to bring a much-limited government agenda to the Democrat party?
Or is it more realistic to acknowledge that it's time for limited government conservatism to go Second Party? Voting for Republicans to carry that banner is a crap shoot so shaky that if you vote for Romney, you're in fact actually voting to HARM limited government conservatism! Oh, wait -- you won't be voting for that, you'll be voting against Hillary, or whoever the next nightmare is. Yeah, that's why I have to vote for a liberal -- to stop a worse one!
The sooner conservatives understand that voting "against" is total poppycock, the sooner we'll start making progress turning things right.
Waaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!!!! You gave me Obama because you didn't vote my way for a liberal, waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!
No wonder the Republican party has been such a loser in terms of enacting conservative government over the past 30 years.
Well, yeah, that ...
But he'd be better than Obama! or Hillary! *ducking*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.