Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatherineofAragon

They cannot point to a single conservative action by the guy. Not one.

and they are here arguing with conservatives and upset that we will not vote for him.

Not a single conservative action folks. they cannot point to a single conservative action. How is that ANY DIFFERENT from a liberal promoting a Democrat? In fact many Democrats have proven records with conservative positions, votes, actions in them. Even Barry and Hillary have Pro traditional marriage on their side. How pathetic does it get to support a guy that can’t even match Barak Obama for conservatism?

Not Romney.


189 posted on 06/16/2014 10:06:36 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: Norm Lenhart

Notice that their “arguments” often consist of one or two sentences. I haven’t seen any responses to direct questions about Mitt’s policy stances. Have I missed anything?


193 posted on 06/16/2014 10:20:13 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: Norm Lenhart; CatherineofAragon; All
Not a single conservative action folks. they cannot point to a single conservative action. How is that ANY DIFFERENT from a liberal promoting a Democrat? In fact many Democrats have proven records with conservative positions, votes, actions in them. Even Barry and Hillary have Pro traditional marriage on their side. How pathetic does it get to support a guy that can’t even match Barak Obama for conservatism?

What you say is absolutely true.

When the Republican party nominates for president of America -- a Republican -- who acts in lockstep with the Democrat agenda in expanding government control and power over every aspect of our lives ---

Is it realistic to think the Republican party would kick Romney out on his ear the same way the Democrat party would kick out Ted Cruz if he switched parties and attempted to bring a much-limited government agenda to the Democrat party?

Or is it more realistic to acknowledge that it's time for limited government conservatism to go Second Party? Voting for Republicans to carry that banner is a crap shoot so shaky that if you vote for Romney, you're in fact actually voting to HARM limited government conservatism! Oh, wait -- you won't be voting for that, you'll be voting against Hillary, or whoever the next nightmare is. Yeah, that's why I have to vote for a liberal -- to stop a worse one!

The sooner conservatives understand that voting "against" is total poppycock, the sooner we'll start making progress turning things right.

217 posted on 06/16/2014 7:18:40 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson