These TRAITORS armed al Qaeda.
There was no ACCOUNTABILITY because of the
absent, abdicating, whoring, EXEMPT Congress.
So, OF COURSE they regard a deserter as an American “hero”.
-- Mark Twain
As Commander in Chief, Obama has the authority to thwart any charges to be brought against Bergdahl. Anyone here think he would allow them?
Unknown? B.S. ...they knew from day 1 he walked off base.
Just like they knew from day 1 Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
Using Obama’s take on this, if we had Rommel, Tojo, Yamamoto, and a couple of other Axis Generals in Custody during WWII, it wouldn’t have been a problem for FDR to trade them all for one American POW Deserter.
Hero or traitor — it doesn’t matter.
Trading five top terrorists for him is insanity.
Susan Rice just misspoke. She meant to say that Bergdahl served the Taliban with honor and distinction after he defected.
How does this impact the legal gov and anyone who supported us in Afghanistan? I’d think they’ll now be red meat for the Taliban. What about our European allies who fought alongside the US in Afghanistan? They can’t be thrilled with the precedent.
Operatives? These five are essentially the War Council or Board of Directors of the Taliban. To call them "operatives" is the understatement of the year.
Susan Rice, “served with honor”? Suzan Rice = Bagdad Bob.
“Honor” and “distinction” obviously mean something vastly different to the Current Regime, than was ever recorded in any dictionary anywhere.
Honor (n.) 1. Good name or public esteem, reputation, recognition; 2. Privilege; 3. Person of superior standing; 4. Exalted title or rank; 5. Chastity; 6. Integrity - well, you get the idea.
Distinction (n.) The quality or state of being distinguished, recognition, worthiness
Almost none of the above applies to Bowe Bergdahl.
It’s worth signing up for FP to read the whole article.
$inator DiFi says the White House broke the law on Bergdahl.
Would have loved to read the whole article but I don’t sign up for stuff.