The "slip" was simply a way to remove him from the scene of the crime.
DiFi said Obama broke the law. DiFi must have needed more money in her ‘in box’ and did not receive the payoff money in her ‘in box’ to have said this.
One thing I’ve been wondering about w/r/t the “outing” of the CIA station chief:
He, of course, can be whisked out of country on the next flight home.
But what about all those Afghanis who have been seen in his company since his arrival?
Oh well. Maybe no one among the bad guys was paying attention.
Beware, I foresee the two major sheiks we have in captivity (WTC 1 AND WTC 2)being released by Obama before he leaves. One does not need a crystal ball to see that coming. Looks like we need some more people captured by them so we can get those two released for them. (Too bad the Ambassador Smith kidnapping went foul.)
Lots of bhind the scenes intel information in this post may help with background details during that period of time - in relation to Burgdahl.
According to this UKGuardian Jan,2012 account, early negotiations for the GITMO-5 did not mention Bergdahl as part of the bargain:
US agrees in principle to releasing top officials from Afghanistan insurgent group in exchange for starting process of negotiations.
*****
Keep in mind, this took place while Hillary was SoS
In politics, there are no ‘coincidences’.............................
That's a possible construction. Of course, it is.
Here's another:
The five Talibani leaders are a make good for a failed Blind Sheik exchange. Amb. Stevens' death queered the first deal...so that Obama owed the Muslim Brotherhood one. The Talibanis were the "compensation pick".
Whatever it is, one can be certain that whatever this administration claims was their motivation is a lie.
“This one if found true by itself deserves not just removal but the firing squad. “
I agree. Bergdahl should also be executed.
An all-out push from the WH and msm to paint this guy a hero and his fellow troops as liars. The machine is on full throttle.
Everyone is focusing on Bergdahl. I doubt Obama cared a hoot about the guy. But Obama did want to get the 5 Taliban leaders out ot GITMO. Why? Excuse me while I adjust my tin foil hat..OK How much drug money would be available to the Taliban if they wanted to buy these guys release, not to mention money available to the King of Qatar? Who would you bribe? Would said person just show up unannouced in Afganistan to pick it up. Would a former Sec of State need to be cut in to her mouth shut? Are these questions really that crazy?
Obama’s action had nothing to do with Bergdahl’s release he needs to empty Getmo before the next two election to hold his base he and party members are in mega panic mode.
Obama has proved once again he’s in need of a keeper.
The regime, including all of its enablers, are guilty of treason. Arrest Congress, the Supreme Court, the Pentagon, Heads of alphabet news networks.
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” - John Harrington
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” - Edmund Burke
Today in WSJ they say the admin HAD to exchange Bergdahl because a VIDEO showed his health was deteriorating. Hmmm.
Same excuse as last time.
This would seem to support your very valid theory about the real reason behind the outing of the CIA station chief in Afghanistan.
Doha is home to a branch of the liberal Brookings Institution, the branch connected to the Chinese spy hatchery called the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.