Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Gen. Dempsey may have tipped the administrations hand.
1 posted on 06/03/2014 12:19:58 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: jazusamo

the admin. hand did not need to be “tipped”


2 posted on 06/03/2014 12:23:06 PM PDT by kingattax (a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I hope you are wrong
but I fear you are right
the POS 0dumbo will allow another POS to go unscathed
even after he caused many honorable warriors to die

I’d like to ask Dempsey what the F the traitor could say that would refute the known facts of his desertion.


3 posted on 06/03/2014 12:25:15 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Enemy captivity? Didn’t they have a report from 2010 saying he deserted?


4 posted on 06/03/2014 12:25:37 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Benghazi)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Qatar is a US surrogate; their intel is basically a subsidiary of US intel. Qatar was the go-between that created the Syrian “rebel” forces on behalf of US intel to topple the stubborn Assad government that would not meld into Western trade/banking/finance enough to suit our elite finance masters’ globalist plans.


5 posted on 06/03/2014 12:26:54 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
"Points of emphasis added. Surely Gen. Dempsey could have acknowledged that among the Americans who risked their lives to find Bergdahl are six who paid the ultimate price."

THIS!

6 posted on 06/03/2014 12:26:57 PM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The Perfumed Prince of the Pentagon speaks....


7 posted on 06/03/2014 12:27:51 PM PDT by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Bowe Bergdahl Scheduled for Promotion to Staff Sergeant in June
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/06/02/Bowe-Bergdahl-Scheduled-For-Promotion-to-Staff-Sergeant-in-June

Col. David Hunt: US Lost 14 SOLDIERS Searching for Deserter Bowe Bergdahl (Video)
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/06/col-david-hunt-we-lost-14-soldiers-searching-for-deserter-bergdahl-video/


8 posted on 06/03/2014 12:28:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

It’s not just the six who died trying to find Bergdahl... I’m curious to know how many died in our efforts to capture the commanders in question. Their lives were worth something too.


12 posted on 06/03/2014 12:30:14 PM PDT by MWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is posting official policy statements on Facebook? WTF?


15 posted on 06/03/2014 12:39:10 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Dempsey should face a court martial. Bergdahl should just be shot.


16 posted on 06/03/2014 12:41:57 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne ("How long, O Lord, holy and true?" - Rev. 6:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

ping


17 posted on 06/03/2014 12:45:22 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
At this point, I don't expect any leadership in the military to think contrary to the liberal agenda. All free thinkers have been retired out (willingly or unwillingly).

Furthermore, I don't believe Bergdahl will be punished in any way regardless of damning evidence found or direct testimony by witnesses. If he has to, Obama will directly pardon him, which will never happen because the military leadership, under Obama’s orders, will squelch it before it gets that far.

The truth is coming out, but what difference does it make? (sarcasm) If anyone criticizes Bergdahl (or his family), they will be called Islam haters and racists by the press to shut them up. Islam and Muslim are the new N words.

20 posted on 06/03/2014 12:48:44 PM PDT by Shugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

BRANDED! Scorned as the one who RAN!
WHAT do you do when you’re BRANDED....
‘Cause you’re one of the TALIBAN????


21 posted on 06/03/2014 12:51:15 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo; All

After Obama fired all those generals and admirals who would not shoot American citizens .. how on earth did Dempsey keep his job ..?? By being the president’s stooge.


23 posted on 06/03/2014 12:55:39 PM PDT by CyberAnt (True the Vote: MY AMERICA, "... I'm terrified it's slipping away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

In other words, we have a new “hero” who is respected by the commander in chief.


25 posted on 06/03/2014 1:00:41 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

These 3 and 4 star officers serving the Emperor should all be fired. They long ago betrayed their country to keep their careers. Kissing his butt is far more important to them than doing what is right and taking retirement in order not to help him destroy the military.


27 posted on 06/03/2014 1:06:19 PM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Gen. Dempsey may have tipped the administrations hand.

What the hell is the Chairman of the JCS doing posting a command opinion on Facebook(!) anyway???

28 posted on 06/03/2014 1:15:03 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Quote:
"The deal to release the five Taliban commanders to Qatar is looking worse and worse"

Anyone else see similarities in this scandalous deal, the Bergdahl/GITMO-5 and Benghazi?

There were suggestions that the reason Steven's repeated requests for increased security were rejected and the reason multiple requests for military assistance during the assault on the embassy property on 9/11 were refused/ignored because of a plan to have the Ambassador kidnapped in order to exchange him for the blind sheik later.

In the Bergdahl case we see this administration broke the law to release the GITMO-5 for Bergdahl.

In both instances, high value Muhammedan warriors were the prize. In both instances American lives were carelessly sacrificed for political gain.

In both instances, the current occupant of the Oval Office was facing an avalanche of negative publicity for multiple policy scandals.

The structure of both incidents resemble enough to suggest there is a common architect, albeit an incompetent team or individual.

Both incidents' goal was to create situations creating heroes worthy of ticker tape parades for this administration. All while both advanced the interests of the resurgent caliphate.

Both failed with enormous consequences in invaluable loss of blood and treasure...and hemmorage of any remaining credibility within this administration.

How many lives have been forever altered/lost at the hands of the blind sheik, GITMO-5, Morsi, Bergdahl, Muslim Brotherhood etc...lost & or forever altered in attempts to redirect negative attention from this administration's persistent lawless malfeasance & for conjured hero parades in favor of our mortal enemy's interests.

30 posted on 06/03/2014 1:21:50 PM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Dempsey’s remark is being headlined on Yahoo as some great endorsement of the Clown.

Sounds stooge like to me.


32 posted on 06/03/2014 1:24:40 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, told Congress last year that the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force does not cover the Benghazi attackers.

Gen. Dempsey’s ‘failures in leadership’ cited in Benghazi disaster

By Rowan Scarborough

The Washington Times

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Congress generally has given the Pentagon a pass on failing to come to the aid of Americans in Benghazi — that is until now.

Six Republicans on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, led by Vice Chairman Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, have issued a blistering criticism of Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, who as Joint Chiefs chairman is the nation’s highest-ranking officer and chief military adviser to President Obama.

Under the heading “Failures in leadership — General Dempsey,” the senators singled out the four-star officer for not having an emergency plan in place in al Qaeda-infiltrated North Africa, including Benghazi, Libya.

No plan meant there were no U.S. forces close enough to arrive in time to help after terrorists invaded the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi at 9:40 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2012, and then attacked a nearby CIA annex holding spies, diplomats and security personnel.

The annex personnel were rescued by a team from the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli and left Benghazi around 10 a.m. Sept. 12. The first U.S. military reinforcements — a Marine Corps Fleet Anti-terrorism Security Team — did not arrive in the country until 9 p.m., 11 hours after the attack.

“The tenure of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, has been marked by what we view as significant deficiencies in command,” the six wrote in an addendum to the committee’s Jan. 15 report on Benghazi. “From Syria to Benghazi, there has been either a profound inability or clear unwillingness to identify and prevent problems before they arise. Given the known operating environment in Benghazi, much less North Africa, a strong military leader would have ensured there was a viable plan in place to rescue Americans should the need arise.”

Gen. Dempsey and Leon E. Panetta, defense secretary at the time of the attack, have testified that time and distance prevented troops from arriving during the fighting. The six Republicans dismissed that reasoning.

“General Dempsey’s attempts to excuse inaction by claiming that forces were not deployed because they would not have gotten there in time does not pass the common sense test,” they wrote. “No one knew when the attacks against our facilities in Benghazi would end, or how aggressive the attacks would be. That is the whole point of a pre-established emergency rescue plan — so that the length of the attack alone does not dictate the rescue or survival of Americans.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/23/gen-dempsey-failed-leader-scathing-senate-review-f/#ixzz33bwp0PU2


35 posted on 06/03/2014 1:43:21 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson