Well knock me over with a feather...
Ah, yes, we don’t want anything but politically-charged, agenda-driven conclusions falsely called “science.”
truncated title to fit
You must submit.
The “peer-reviewed” journals have been rejecting papers that question AGW/Climate-change for decades. The entire peer-review process has become a joke.
Regardless of their occupation!
...media, education, science, entertainment
The true beauty of nature and by extension the laws that describe it can’t be nullified/modified by fiat to fit our whims. No matter how the left huffs and puffs they won’t have the last word.
Well...
I mean...
The science IS settled, after all...
/s
and the truth is always detrimental to the cause of lies.
Well, there is no grant money in “False alarm! Everything is okay.” Don’t want to de-rail the gravy train...
“A scientific study which suggests global warming has been exaggerated was rejected by a respected journal because it might fuel climate scepticism”
The assertion that the paper had been rejected because it "contained errors and did not sufficiently advance the science," was not supported in the article.
It sounds like a flimsy excuse to reject the paper. The people who believe in man made global warming have few, if any at all, papers that clearly present their assumptions, methodology, and data. This is not done because they would have no supported scientific case for man caused global warming, other than questionable claims of consensus and claims of "settled science."
Because there are $ billions being spent to prove that mankind is the cause of climate change, those benefiting from the flow of money have a vested interest, and thus should be disqualified from making claims. We have the situation of the fox guarding the hen house. The consensus is based on Chicken Little's version, and no one else's findings and questions are permitted.
:: the research was ‘less than helpful’ to the climate cause. ::
And Galileo, Copernicus, et.al. were “less than helpful” to the geocentric theory.
Leftist "intolerance" LOL
Submit Data for a report....
Goes against the Orthodox Climate Change Priests....
“SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!!!!”
History repeats itself - many articles were rejected in the Germany of the thirties as being ‘unhelpful’ to the cause of Hitler.
Oh yeah?
Well you’re a racist!
/sarc(????)
Setting aside the fact that this is measured from a volcano, the point I want to make here is that the difference in concentration over these 50-ish years is a mere 100 parts per million (rounded UP).
That's a change in one part per 10,000 - or 1/100th of 1% (.01%).
It's going to take a lot of convincing to prove to me that .01% of anything could impact the climate at all.