Under deep cover as a graduate student at perhaps the most liberal University in the United States, I have been away from FR for quite some time now. I've learned a lot about the way an intelligent and highly educated liberal east coast mind works. I believe that this article presents something of a teachable moment in that regard. I wont speak to Mr. Cohens intelligence, but he would qualify, by most standards, as highly educated. I believe that he has a masters in journalism from the Pulitzer school at Columbia. He has also shown a willingness to cross the aisle on matters of foreign policy, particularly when the pertain to Israel. When he writes about terrorism, I read him, if only to hear what the other side is being told about an issue. And that, in a nutshell, is the main issue for Conservatives when it comes to Benghazi. We are appalled at the death of four Americans, and the fact that the perpetrators are still at large. Given the duration of the attack, we wonder whether anything could have been done to save them. We recognize the White Houses response for what it was: A misuse of power in an attempt to sweep inconvenient facts under the rug so as not to allow them to influence an upcoming election. We are angered by the actions of sworn public servants to hinder subsequent investigations. But, most of all, we see this issue as a touchstone for something very wrong in todays political marketplace: A complete breakdown in the medias obligation to present all of the facts to their audience. In the last three years, for obvious reasons, I went to great efforts to avoid talking about politics. I was surrounded by affable, but true-believing, liberals. I was investing a lot of time and money into an advanced degree. I could not afford to waste it arguing. Nevertheless, I cannot tell you how many times I was surprised to learn that my highly intelligent and successful professional Ivy League classmates in their 30s and 40s had not heard names, places and terms that I supposed were common knowledge: Single Payer System. Kermit Gosnell. Brian Terry. The difference between a machine gun and a semi-automatic weapon. The fact that Mitt Romney had no intention of putting GM out of business and laying off all of its workers. Or that John McCain never said he wanted to go to war with Russia over the Ukraine. Or that Paul Ryan was trying to SAVE Social Security and Medicare. Benghazi. Not didnt care never HEARD. What became very clear to me during this time is the extent to which liberals and conservatives get their facts from very different sources. Personally, I have always disagreed with the Conservative canon on two or three important issues. Which ones they are is irrelevant. I make a point of never proselytizing here. The point, which most people here are very aware of, is the liberal tendency to form opinions without having all the facts. It seems that we have become so politically divided in this country that virtually everyone who cares about politics gets all of their information from entertainment news shows (like FOX and MSNBC) or simply entertainment (like Comedy Central and the major networks). We know that journalism appeals to a disproportionate share of young liberals. There is a liberal culture in media, and that probably will never change. We live in a center-right nation that gets its news from people that it disagrees with. That was the inspiration behind FOX, and the reason why it is the #1 rated cable news channel. Unfortunately, somewhere in the last decade, (I would say it was during the first Obama campaign), liberals on other networks began to assess their ratings correctly: They finally understood the reason behind the fact that 1/3 of the nation preferred to get their news from people they agreed with, and decided to write them off in favor of the other third. In doing this, they put themselves into competition with themselves for the liberal base. At that point, they decided to trust FOX, and only FOX, to present one side of the story. Liberals who watched the news used to hear views, news, and opinions about things that they didnt care about because journalists took their jobs seriously. Now they get a steady stream of what they want to hear, and if theyre lucky, weak straw-man arguments like the ones presented in the last paragraph. Is it any wonder that they (Mr. Cohen included) have finally concluded that a political philosophy that includes geniuses like (you dont have to agree with everything these people say, just recognize that they are among the smartest political philosophers alive today) Dr. Ben Carson, Charles Krauthammer, Paul Gigot, Thomas Sowell, George Will, Laura Ingraham, Daniel Henninger, Mark Steyn, etc., is nothing but a bunch of uneducated yokels? They are working off a different script. I suppose that I will need to turn these thoughts into a standalone vanity piece at some point when I have more time. For the moment, I will say that I have come to the conclusion that FOX is actually part of the problem. The solution is for more conservatives to get themselves hired at liberal news networks. The solution is not another network perceived as only conservative. That will only exacerbate the problem.
1 posted on
05/13/2014 1:22:42 PM PDT by
presidio9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: presidio9
The Big Scam is starting to fall apart. The Grifter has the Shills out for one last try. If it doesn’t work, the Shills can help cover the escape. Talk louder, Richard!
55 posted on
05/13/2014 2:35:29 PM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: presidio9
It sounds as though Little Dick is the one who is becoming “unhinged”. Must be worried about November.
63 posted on
05/13/2014 3:30:27 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
To: presidio9
You’d be singing a different tune if it had happened under Bush, wouldn’t you Cohen?
71 posted on
05/13/2014 9:56:21 PM PDT by
Impy
(RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
To: presidio9
If all the brilliant, intellectual, cosmically superior Progressive geniuses were ever to dedicate their brains to the advancement of the human race through inovation and invention, they wouldn’t have enough time to think of themselves as highly educated and brilliant.
They also wouldn’t have the time to characterize
non-Progressives as gun-loving, bible-thumping,
knuckle-dragging, Christian morons.
IMHO
78 posted on
05/14/2014 5:45:13 AM PDT by
ripley
To: presidio9
Should we assume all democrat candidates from now on are officially considered unaccountable for their actions?
By which I mean, will they openly run on the statement “I am not accountable?”
84 posted on
05/16/2014 3:13:31 PM PDT by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson