Skip to comments.
Newt: Gays Need To Be More Tolerant
Truth Revolt ^
| May 13,2014
| Larry O'Connor
Posted on 05/13/2014 10:40:07 AM PDT by Biggirl
On CNN's Crossfire, co-host Newt Gingrich pushed back against recent recriminations against people speaking out against Michael Sam kissing his boyfriend on ESPN after he was drafted by the St. Louis Rams.
(Excerpt) Read more at truthrevolt.org ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: football; gays; gaystapo; nfl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
1
posted on
05/13/2014 10:40:07 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
To: Biggirl
Is he running for President again?
2
posted on
05/13/2014 10:42:09 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Biggirl
They want age of consent lowered to 1(one)
3
posted on
05/13/2014 10:44:55 AM PDT
by
molson209
(Blank)
To: Slings and Arrows
4
posted on
05/13/2014 10:44:58 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
(“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
To: Biggirl
More tolerant? How about just tolerant?
5
posted on
05/13/2014 10:46:09 AM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: Biggirl
Images of two men kissing is vile and DISGUSTING and we need to be very public about trashing it as such. With NO apologies, Charles Barkley style!!
To: Biggirl
How did we go from "the love that dare not speak its name" to "the love that will not shut the bleep up?"
7
posted on
05/13/2014 10:54:50 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: Biggirl
Yeah...good luck with that. That’s like saying blacks need to be less racist.
8
posted on
05/13/2014 10:55:21 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Only Liberals can look at an amendment that says “shall not be infringed" and see blank parchment.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
At least somebody is saying it.
9
posted on
05/13/2014 10:56:01 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Biggirl
He’s gotta’ stop calling them “gays.” They are homosexuals. Why is that so tough?
10
posted on
05/13/2014 10:56:16 AM PDT
by
laweeks
To: Biggirl
I am not a Newt fan, and I would never vote for him but he is right this time. Plus the whole leftwing needs to be more tolerant, but they won’t.
11
posted on
05/13/2014 10:56:57 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: Biggirl
Shouldnt you also be teaching people who are gay to be open and understanding of people?Don't be silly. Why that would be like asking people of color to condemn racism existing within their own communities.
12
posted on
05/13/2014 10:59:11 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Biggirl
The Liberal Mantra:Burning the American Flag = Patriotic Dissent & Freedom
Disliking Homosexuality = hate
anything else??
13
posted on
05/13/2014 10:59:11 AM PDT
by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: Biggirl
Gays hang out in different circles and want to widen those circles, but attacking those who say NO, is not going to win them friends.
14
posted on
05/13/2014 10:59:15 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: GeronL
The left will be more tolerant when everybody is dead. And like the Muslims,
when they run out of enemies to kill they'll turn onto themselves.
There is no difference between the Left and Terrorists.
15
posted on
05/13/2014 11:00:41 AM PDT
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: MaxMax
16
posted on
05/13/2014 11:00:59 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: Biggirl
How did being a sodomite create such political power that people are now begging sodomites to please be more tolerant? How did this happen?
There's no such thing as "Gay Rights" - it is an oxymoron. It turns common sense, decency, and natural law on its head. Sodomy is a perversion and clinically shown to be the result of a damaged person. The history of Judeo-Christian law shows an aversion and illegality to the perversion of sodomy. And there's certainly nothing in Judeo-Christian tradition nor in the Constitution that justifies giving sodomites some kind of special legal rights or classification. Sodomites are not a valid legal or Constitutional class like blacks.
The opportunistic politicians and feds won't deal properly with this, so again, it's probably going to be up to the states to nullify unconstitutional SCOTUS decisions and federal law that grants sodomites these special rights that prevent individuals and states from choosing to deny sodomites any special privileges or recognition.
What was a debate about outlawing sodomy has quickly turned into a debate about the special legal rights of sodomites to force their will on society. Makes your head spin.
17
posted on
05/13/2014 11:03:46 AM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: laweeks
18
posted on
05/13/2014 11:04:16 AM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: God luvs America
Or rather the liberals are AFRAID of the truth.
19
posted on
05/13/2014 11:09:12 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
(“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
To: Biggirl
"Tolorant you say...!!!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson