Posted on 04/24/2014 4:57:51 PM PDT by Third Person
CLIVEN BUNDY: Now let me talk about the Spanish people. You know, I understand that they come over here against our Constitution and cross our borders. But they're here and they're people. I worked side-by-side with a lot of them. Don't tell me they don't work, and don't tell me they don't pay taxes. Don't tell me they don't have better family structures than most of us white people. When you see those Mexican families, they're together. They picnic together. They're spending their time together. And I'll tell you, in my way of thinking, they're awful nice people. We need to have those people join us and be with us.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
I’s like to know his views on the Ukraine and the missing MH370.
....or being really clever. Likely trying to woo the amnesty loving GOPe so they don't think he's the ignorant, racist deadbeat he's been made out to be.
/tongue cheek
All cattle, no hat.
Has Clive Bundy suddenly decided to run for Speaker of the House?
Honestly, you put a camera in my face and let me, average Joe six-pack, say whatever comes to mind. I might be kicking a few hornets nests myself. Might even say a few words that would curl the hair on a Mexican dog...er...Spanish people’s dog, that is.
Golly Moses.
I respectfully disagree with Mr. Bundy about immigration and the Constitution. PC interpretations of the Constitution's uniform Rule of Naturalization, Clause 4 of Section 8 of Article I, aside, please consider the following.
The Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the Constitution's silence about things like immigration means that such issues are automatically state power issues. In other words, the Constitution doesn't say yes or no to immigration, but simply delegates government power to regulate immigration uniquely to the states.
Our leaders and Clive Bundy do not live surrounded by the new poverty class, that takes our money, and destroys our neighborhoods and culture.
Right. And if you disagree with those opinions on some of these threads, you are given labels. I agree with some of his positions and disagree with others. He is right on grazing rights. He is wrong on slavery being not that different then what's going on now. He is wrong on amnesty.
Who’s on tap for tomorrow, American Indians?
Or rape. Or what constitutes "legitimate" rape. Or any theories about how the body magically prevents pregnancy after rape. Just.....don't do it.
That’s a common perspective from old timers in western ranching. The Spaniards were ranching in the West a very long time ago, and many Mexicans have done the same since. I’ve met several ranchers of German descent who can speak Spanish. Most of those opposed are originally from big corporations, in debt up to their ears now and haven’t been in ranching for long.
Cliven Cliven .....foot in mouth disease
Let your more literate and erudite offspring speak for the cause .
You are old and stumble with your words and thoughts .
Stop while you are ahead
This guy is now making conservatives a laughing joke. He has removed the central issue from the front pages and made it about him and his personal beliefs. I just heard his original comments not his double down ones and I was like wow forget about the land being the issue this guy has lost it. Stick
a fork in him. “He’s dead Jim”
“Now let me talk about the Jews...”
Ahead was 2 weeks ago...he has lost his opportunity to hold his audience...lost cause now
Hahaha omfg I spit out my water! Now that was funny.
I tell ya , getting in front of a camera and a microphone goes to some peoples heads ......
Dude I am in tears I swear it lol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.