I read that. Ugh. I wonder if there is more to it, or if Bundy will claim he did not make those statements.
Sometimes it is important to be focussed on ONE issue and to keep your mouth shut on others.
Response coming from Harry Reid in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
The left confuses message and messenger a lot
"I disagree with what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it." What a joke.
Run & hide everyone. The leftist media win after all.
I wouldn’t word it that way, but I’ve basically articulated the same point. He’s basically saying that as bad as slavery was, are they better off now in the projects than they were on the plantation?
This is not an endorsement of the plantation. Rather, it is a condemnation of the welfare state.
Like Harry Reid said...
“Something will happen...”
“...The New York Times has overheard Cliven Bundy...”
Really? How?
Smear machine cranks up.
Has there been confirmation from any other source that Bundy actually made these remarks?
But still, guys like Sharpton say things that are ten times more outrageous than what Bundy said, and they get a pass.
I’ve never been a fan of this guy... but I’m far more opposed to the tactics used by the imperial federal government.
He needs to stay on subject matter that he’s familiar with... ranching.
Actually it sounds like what Bundy said if he even said it is factually correct. Just politically incorrect. I don’t read that as racist.
I think what Mr. Bundy meant was that picking cotton is preferable to sitting around not working and living off the govt handout.
“The New York Times has overheard Cliven Bundy”
Really?
I guess, if he really said it, he could have left out the bit about picking cotton, but otherwise, he’s spot on. Today, Black’s are only “disadvantaged” by their own life’s choices. They need to emulate Dr. Ben Carson, not the crooked Blacks that run for political office so they can steal from the rest of us.
Cliven Bundy said that about Negroes when he met with the BLM did he? That’s an odd topic of discussion if they were there to remove his cattle. Was it recorded by anyone because I haven’t seen or heard anything about this online but it sure would be a way to kill his reputation with the minorites if it were true. Let’s say it’s not the truth and is just a fabrication put out by the MSM or a liberal news source to damage his reputation. Now how would it look. But let’s say its true. Did he lie about what he saw? If not then it’s just an observation and inflammatory to those who are sensitive to the truth. Basically it amounts to committing a criminal action in the public PC court which is controlled by the MSM.
What was Racist about it?
That he was a White man pointing out the OBVIOUS problems in modern Black culture and the government as the root cause?
Oh heavens... How dare he... :-|
Its incredible how stupid some people are - but then bigots are never generally very bright in the first place.
HOWEVER, this issue is NOT about Bundy. This issue is about the BLM, Federal bureaucracies, corruption of entrenched incumbents (Harry Reid), states rights and the Constitution.
Somebody should tell Bundy to shut his mouth and let intelligent people handle this.
The New York Times overheard. Stop right there.
because the liberal media said so, we must believe it is the truth. The media will twist the truth to fit their agenda... That IS the truth.
Hell, this now looks to be a political disaster.
All because Bundy could not STFU.
The NY Times would never deal in hearsay. Right?