Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Paging hairy reid-iclulous. Well hairy, another domestic terroritst? What, no comment? Yet.
1 posted on 04/23/2014 8:44:53 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman


2 posted on 04/23/2014 8:51:24 AM PDT by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
stretches 116 miles along the Red River.

A watershed boundary or some such crap?
3 posted on 04/23/2014 8:51:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The Texas Rangers are waiting for you!


4 posted on 04/23/2014 8:57:34 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The issue does not seem to be the feds coming into Texas, as such. The disagreement is over where the border of Texas is.


5 posted on 04/23/2014 8:57:48 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Harry’s expressing the frustration that all control freaks do when those they think they have a right to control tell them that they will not obey.


7 posted on 04/23/2014 8:59:06 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
From what I've read, the Supreme Court solved the dispute in 2000 when they designate the boundaries to settle it.

Now, the Bureau of LoudMouths have suddenly decided that they're going to confiscate the land until Congress gets around to setting boundaries for dispute that no longer exists!

Like everyone is too stupid to realize the feral government has NO intention of giving it back once they get it.

I agree with Abbott. Come and Take It, suckers!

9 posted on 04/23/2014 9:08:40 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LUV W; txhurl; GeronL; Bender2

Texas Ping.


11 posted on 04/23/2014 9:19:25 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

“I am about ready to go to the Red River and raise a ‘Come and Take It’ flag to tell the feds to stay out of Texas,” Abbott said.

You’re about ready? Then what will make you ready?


12 posted on 04/23/2014 9:20:15 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

A couple of other threads if anyone is interested in reading the many comments thereon:

EXCLUSIVE—TEXAS AG ABBOTT TO BLM: ‘COME AND TAKE IT’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3147402/posts
235 comments

BLM EYES 90,000 ACRES OF TEXAS LAND
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3147020/posts
116 comments


15 posted on 04/23/2014 9:36:53 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

AG Abbott’s letter to the BLM

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/oagnews/release.php?id=4718

Specific Questions that were asked:

Accordingly, I hereby request that you or your staff respond in writing to this
letter by providing the following information as soon as possible:

1. Please delineate with specificity each of the steps for the RMP/EIS process for
property along the Red River.

2. Please describe the procedural due process the BLM will afford to Texans whose
property may be claimed by the federal government.

3. Please confirm whether the BLM agrees that, from 1923 until the ratification
of the Red River Boundary Compact, the boundary between Texas and Oklahoma was
the gradient line of the south bank of the Red River. To the extent the BLM does
not agree, please provide legal analysis supporting the BLM’s position.

4. Please confirm whether the BLM still considers Congress’ ratification of the Red
River Boundary Compact as determinative of its interest in land along the Red River?
To the extent the BLM does not agree, please provide legal analysis supporting the
BLM’s new position.

5. Please delineate with specificity the amount of Texas territory that would be
impacted by the BLM’s decision to claim this private land as the property of the
federal government.

end snip


16 posted on 04/23/2014 9:44:32 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Good for him! Most folks wouldn’t have understood, “Molon Labe.”


23 posted on 04/23/2014 11:36:25 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

You can tell that Abbot is running for reelection. Too bad we couldn’t dump him in the primary.


25 posted on 04/23/2014 2:35:21 PM PDT by zeugma (Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss (I'll see you again someday Hope))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

And where is Windy Davis?
Bet she is on the side of the feds.
If I was Abbot, I would have someone keep an eye on her.


27 posted on 04/23/2014 2:45:38 PM PDT by Texas resident (The democrat party is now the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson