Skip to comments.
OBAMA'S ORIGINS RESURFACE AT INTEL EXPERT'S TRIAL
http://www.wnd.com ^
| 4/20/14
| Jerome Corsi
Posted on 04/20/2014 7:07:55 PM PDT by westcoastwillieg
LONDON In a nearly empty courtroom at the Southwerk Crown Court by the historic London Bridge, a hearing took place in a criminal case that not only has national security implications for the United Kingdom, but, curiously, is woven into the increasingly bizarre fabric of the controversy over Barack Obamas presidential eligibility.
When it came his time to speak, defendant Michael Shrimpton, a middle-aged London barrister by profession and self-proclaimed intelligence expert, politely issued to the judge a series of interrogatories that made clear he plans to launch a vigorous defense, representing himself before the court.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arapio; corsi; eligibility; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamafamily; sheriffjoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 last
To: newfreep
There are always things in the past they have over looked.
To: chaosagent
Too bad that you still don’t know the difference between the word “a” and the word “the”.
62
posted on
04/21/2014 10:51:40 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Brown Deer
Like I said, their bridge, their ‘a’, their ‘the’, their ‘historical’.
63
posted on
04/22/2014 9:08:24 AM PDT
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: chaosagent
Like I said...
It can't be "the", if like you said, it is one of many.
64
posted on
04/22/2014 10:55:09 AM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Brown Deer
Try looking at it this way, Great Britain has had many Kings and Queens. They are “historic,” even the current monarch.
It’s the same with the London Bridge(s).
his·tor·ic
histôrik,-stär-/
adjective
1. famous or important in history, or potentially so.
“we are standing on a historic site”
To: Brown Deer
Right now it is ‘the’ because it’s ‘the’ only one.
66
posted on
04/22/2014 12:22:19 PM PDT
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: MMaschin
To: Rustybucket
Yes.
I was under the impression, based on the context used, that it was the keratinized hair and nail tissue that was being discussed. If one was to go to a hair salon, and pick up cut hair or cuticle's they would have keratin with no nuclear material with DNA.
68
posted on
04/22/2014 1:50:29 PM PDT
by
MMaschin
To: Nero Germanicus
Like you said, “a”. Yes, it might be “a” historic site, but “the” historic London Bridge is located in Arizona.
69
posted on
04/22/2014 4:33:17 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: chaosagent
Right now it is the because its the only one.
Nope, you are wrong again.
70
posted on
04/22/2014 4:37:09 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Brown Deer
Once again you’ve wandered off course.
The relevant article mentioned the historic London Bridge in England.
The one in Arizona was never mentioned.
Try and keep up.
71
posted on
04/22/2014 6:20:03 PM PDT
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: Brown Deer
Now THAT I can agree with.
There are approximately thirty four bridges in London that span the River Thames but only one is named “London Bridge.” It is the name rather than the current 1973 structure itself that is historic.
To: chaosagent
Once again youve wandered off course.
The relevant article mentioned the historic London Bridge in England.
No, it is you who is lost, not me. Once again, the article stated:
"In a nearly empty courtroom at the Southwerk Crown Court by the historic London Bridge..."
which is now located in Arizona.
The one in Arizona was never mentioned.
but indeed it was mentioned, since "the historic London Bridge" has been located in Arizona for over 40 years. It spans the historic Colorado River, which also goes through the historic Grand Canyon.
The writer of the article most likely meant to refer to the new London Bridge or the historic area that the newer bridge is located in, but that is not what he wrote. He didn't write "a" historic bridge. He wrote "the historic London Bridge" and once again that bridge is located in Arizona, whether you like it or not.
73
posted on
04/22/2014 7:12:32 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Brown Deer
Once again, their bridge, their ‘historic’.
They can call it what they want, or describe it how they want.
The present one was built over 40 years ago. For some people that’s ancient history. Thus ‘historic’.
74
posted on
04/22/2014 9:24:05 PM PDT
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: chaosagent
Once again, their bridge, their historic.
They can call it what they want, or describe it how they want.
They don't describe the bridge as "historic". They refer to it as a "modern" bridge.
For some people thats ancient history. Thus historic.
Maybe to a child, like you, but maybe someday you might grow up and learn something.
75
posted on
04/22/2014 11:04:36 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Brown Deer
Considering the author can’t even spell Southwark correctly, I’d not fuss his description of the bridge.
76
posted on
05/22/2014 6:24:50 PM PDT
by
EC1
To: EC1
I also noticed the spelling and was waiting to see if anyone would ever mention it. ;-)
77
posted on
05/22/2014 7:47:33 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Brown Deer
78
posted on
05/22/2014 9:10:57 PM PDT
by
EC1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson