Posted on 04/17/2014 11:58:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
GOP presidential hopefuls are largely steering clear of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundys fight with the federal government.
The showdown, which left armed militia members and feds staring each other down last week, has captivated talk radio and cable news shows, turning Bundy into a conservative cause célèbre.
Yet Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor and 2008 presidential candidate, are the only big-name Republicans to have spoken out on the dispute so far. Tea Party favorite Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has been silent, and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) have also not commented on Bundy, who has been fighting the federal government in and out of court for more than 20 years over his refusal to pay cattle grazing fees.
All three offices did not respond to calls for this story.
GOP strategists suggested that Bundys case is too risky for most candidates eyeing the presidency, particularly given the possibility of armed conflict with federal police.
The Republican Partys very sympathetic to Cliven Bundys property rights, states rights argument, said strategist Ford OConnell, who worked on John McCains 2008 campaign. But many Republicans also prize the rule of law above all else. Right or wrong, Bundy had his day in court and lost.
Matt Mackowiak, who has worked on various Capitol Hill campaigns and as a congressional press secretary, agreed that candidates have good reason to be cautious in the Bundy dispute.
If you dont know the person, and you havent followed the situation closely, all you do is you look at the situation and see risk, Mackowiak, who contributes to The Hill's Pundits Blog, said.
Still, Bundys arguments and the battle on his ranch feed into a strain of the GOP worried about what it sees as a growing incursion
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Bump for later reading.
CGato
Again with the “armed militia members”. I guess the SWAT team was there to put flowers in the barrels of their guns.
Of course they are. The GOP has NO BALLS. About this or anything else.
They better not steer clear. Bundy Ranch is going to bring Reid down once all the leads are followed. I am on to a bunch of hot stuff. Reids consigliere Jay Brown and Utah bribe allegations can become radioactive. Ive updated the following page.
http://www.futurnamics.com/reid_brown.php
Dax to the top.
The DC GOP doesn't want the conservative smallfolk getting the mistaken notion that they're different from their Democratic colleagues.
:-)
“GOP stars steer clear of Nevada ranch fight”
They don’t want to be seen as conected to old-school, gun toting constitutionalists out in the hinterlands.
Nice find. Good info at that link.
GOP stars steer clear of Nevada ranch fight
Bookmark to your post 17 and 47. Lots of interesting information on this thread.
From what I gather, he has not paid.
However....
If his situation is similar to that faced by Wayne Hage in NV a few years ago, he is not required to.
But it took years in court, and a lot of bucks, for Hage to win his case....and the Gov't continues to appeal their loss and have not paid a dime of their $14 Million judgement.
Researching the situation has taught me much. My time spent on it has irritated my wife, but it has surely toughened my resolve for what must come.
It is well worth your time...look for interviews with Wayne Hage (deceased now) and lectures by Stephen Pratt on the Constitution and original intent. Lots of other sources, but those are a very good start.
Hehe.
Outstanding.
The Gutless Obsolete Pretenders are trying to force the people of this country to move on from ballots to bullets.
You listen to too much CNN.
I never listen to CNN. I haven't had cable television in more than 15 years.
Can you help us out with some facts to substantiate that aspersion?
From what I have read it seems the media has already dug into, and reported on, the most detailed minutia about Bundy and his position on the issue.
In just a few weeks we have learned more from the media about Cliven Bundy's background than they have reported on Barack Obama in five years.
I don't know if they have already dug trough his garbage like they did with Sarah Palin but if not you can bet they will be on it pretty soon.
The catalyst for the BLM's current aggression seems to be related to the nearby construction of a solar power field that Harry Reid's son is involved in.
Below is some info on an incriminating document that the BLM has purged from their web site.
They (the BLM) do not want to the solar plant to be constructed on the land Bundy uses ("Gold Butte").
Rather, they want the land Bundy uses to mitigate (offset) other land they will free up for construction of the Dry Lake Solar power project.
Specifically, look at the 8th "dotted" item:
(Non-Governmental Organizations have expressed concern that the regional mitigation strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone utilizes Gold Butte as the location for offsite mitigation for impacts from solar development, and that those restoration activities are not durable with the presence of trespass cattle")
You can link to the cached scrubbed document here:
http://archive.is/www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/lvfo/blm_programs/more/trespass_cattle/cattle_trespass_impacts.html
Or here:
http://archive.today/nvlzr
I wasn’t on board with the ENN connection because it wasn’t at Dry Lake. The Liberty Unyielding article connects Dry Lake to First Solar and its political connections.
But there is a problem with ENN. Rory Reid does have a conflict of interest in that he represented ENN and voted for amendments to the Clark County MSHCP. MSHCP deals with mitigation actions which benefit ENN and other developers.
You listen to too much ABC, CBS and NBC even worse. :-)
I agree that Bundy’s no longer the issue. Fedthuggery is the issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.