“We never did have any hand-to-hand combat this morning or up to his time,” Mr. Bundy told the newspaper on Thursday afternoon. “But there’s like 200 armed military people on my ranch. That’s pretty bad to have that much armed force against American people.”
“We need to be the barrier between the oppressed and the tyrants,” Ryan Payne told the Review-Journal. “Expect to see a band of soldiers.”
“Several US senators and the state of Nevada this week also criticized what has been called the result of an “overreaching” agency acting overzealously, but federal officials say the rancher’s cattle are simply not allowed to roam on the disputed land, which the government insists is federal property. According to the BLM, Bundy owes around $1 million in fees that he’s incurred since 1993 when he lost his grazing permit for the chunk of land that had been in his family since the 1870s.”
The irony is rich. This administration has applauded violent popular (or astroturfed) civil disorder against established authority. It seems that for ‘wogs’, not civilized tyrannies.
Welcome to medieval rule and plunder. This is just another epic scandal from the group that doesn’t give a care about our rights or any US laws for that matter.
The alphabet-soup army is poised to massacre
all those who dare to endanger the poor
little desert tortoise.
Well, which story are they going with?
The trespassing killers of the turtles or the overdue renters ?
Liars....
Jackboots everywhere you look. They’re as bad as the corrupt people who give them their marching orders.
Sure to make Obama look even better on the world scene.
every patriot owned small aircraft within 200 miles should spend all day tomorrow violating the so-called No Fly zone . F um
In Russia Putin would have rounded up all those cattle personally. Bare chested, of course.
Mentioned on another thread: The border patrol uses beanbag rounds on illegal aliens crossing into this country, but is readying to use Apache attack helicopters here on US citizens. In case anyone wanted a sense of federal priorities.
I can’t wait until a Democrat stands up and say’s the rule of law must be upheld.
This whole story makes me barf.
The motherf@cker in the white house and his lick-spittle Harry Reid are about to pee on an electric fence. Hilarity ensues.
All this ‘action’ over 1000 head of cattle and a million dollars in grazing fees paid to the state, instead of the federal government?
People need to keep this all in perspective.
Any act that refuses the payment of TAXes/FEE will result in your death. The government will kill you if you do not pay-up and confiscate your livelihood.
Just consider when one posts about ‘starving the beast’ etc. the consequences the government will extract against you.
One angle that can be played up is an announcement that patriotic Americans certainly agree with Eric Holder’s statement that state AG’s should not enforce whatever laws they don’t believe in. It follows that individual Patriotic Americans also reserve that right not to follow and support what ever unjust laws Holder, the EPA, BLM, BATF, ect happen to support!
If the US’s top law enforcement lawyer advocates selective lawlessness, so should the American people!
PS: I’m not really advocating total anarchy...just trying to point out Holder’s increasingly indefensible positions.
And I’ll bet some Russians are thinking, “I never thought of that.”...
Only in Amerika.
One aspect no one is writing about: The election year aspect of this. It really is too convenient of timing if you think about it. The real question is who are calling the shots here: BLM or puppet’s staff at the WH...
A federal government is clearly too big when a “land management” agency can afford to have its own sniper team. A government has more money than it needs to conduct its core functions is a government that will busy itself with finding more things to control and ways to extend its power. This is the Iron Law of bureaucracy.
A government that can create its own money does not have to ask taxpayers for permission to spend more to feed its self-serving bureaucratic activities. When states start calling for a Convention to consider amendments to the Constitution, the first topic must be to restrain federal spending. A government that must live within its means is a government that must focus on the important things rather than imposing evermore intrusive laws and regulations having the weight of law.
Every day more people are coming to the judgment that a carefully organized effort to repair the constitution via the States’ power to propose and ratify amendments has less risk to our liberty and prosperity than the present trajectory of the federal government and especially the federal bureaucracy.
FNC is covering this now. Bob Massi is reporting a history of Fed land in NV and the ranches there. With 82% of NV land managed by the Feds where else are they to graze their cattle he points out.