Posted on 04/06/2014 6:43:36 AM PDT by rktman
Fox News Channel anchor Shepard Smith spoke with Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace on Friday about the ongoing investigation into the shooting at Ft. Hood when he expressed his revulsion over the debate over access to guns that follows a mass shooting. He said it was nauseating how both sides of the gun issue come out screaming largely before the victims have even been buried.
If somebody wanted to bring a gun up here, you could bring a gun up here, Smith observed. You cant stop every criminal in advance.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
Shep who?
Says the man from Holly Springs, Mississippi. A town that people have to have armed guards to remove coins from vending machines.
What this tells me, is that it finally dawned on Shep what the anti-gun contingent has been up to, and how they game these issues.
Damn scared to actually address just that lobby, Shep has to toss in “Both sides” to cover the issue.
Shep is a clueless twerp!
It’s telling that Sheppie-boy didn’t get nauseated until the pro-Second Amendment folks started replying to the Bloomberg crowd. His nausea was kept well hidden in the aftermath of Littletown, when the NRA said they’d refuse comment for a period of time after the shootings out of respect for the victims. Meanwhile, the Brady and Bloomberg people were all over the airwaves demanding political action before the bodies were room temperature.
Sheppie was fine with that, I assume.
He and others on Fox haven’t a clue when it comes to Conservatism. They bill themselves as the network that shows both sides, but the Conservative side gets very short shrift IMO.
I’m sure Sheppie was find with it. He wouldn’t know why not to be fine with it.
I just threw up in my mouth a little....thanks
Smith observed. You cant stop every criminal in advance.
That is correct. That is why every American has the right to protect themselves and nothing does that better then a gun.
And it’s not a compromise unless both sides GET something. And your enemies settling for stealing less from you isn’t “getting something”. They’d have to give up something they already have to make it a compromise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.