Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Real Women Vote Democrat, or Do They?
Townhall.com ^ | April 4, 2014 | Mona Charen

Posted on 04/04/2014 6:21:20 AM PDT by Kaslin

"The conservative minds of the Heritage Foundation have found a way for Republicans to shrink the gender gap: They need to persuade more women to get their MRS degrees." So wrote the Washington Post's Dana Milbank about a panel that featured Mollie Hemingway, Karin Agness and yours truly.

It was so nice of Milbank to attend -- a shame that his mind was so clenched shut that he could hear only what his prejudices led him to expect, rather than what we actually said. Hate to interrupt a good sneer, but the panel wasn't about the gender gap; it was about feminism.

Milbank focused narrowly on the political implications of our talk and couldn't resist descending to the most tired leftist cliche, namely that "the consensus was that we ought to go back in history." The left cannot shake is starry-eyed confidence that history has a vector -- that forward is always toward the sunny uplands of equality, prosperity and happiness -- and backward is always a descent. Tell that to Germans in 1933 or Cambodians in 1975. Ask a newly captured slave onboard a ship in the middle passage if he wanted to "go back in history."

Speaking for myself and not my fellow panelists, I do believe that feminism took a number of wrong turns since the 1970s -- rejecting marriage, embracing the sexual revolution, cheerleading for abortion without any restrictions, vehemently denying that young children pay a price when they are placed in institutional care, recycling bogus statistics like the 77-cents myth, spurning the accomplishments of conservative heroines like Margaret Thatcher and Condoleezza Rice, demonizing men as oppressors. It's a long list.

But most of my talk at the Heritage Foundation wasn't especially partisan or even political. I was quoting the social science that scholars across the political spectrum agree upon -- namely, that a focus on women's progress and glass ceilings and "leaning" this way and that misses the most important news: Men are falling behind. A larger percentage of women than men finish high school. Women now earn 57 percent of bachelor's degrees, 63 percent of master's degrees, and 53 percent of doctorates. Men are earning less and dropping out of the labor force at alarming rates. Women are earning more and taking a larger percentage of managerial and supervisory posts.

The decline of marriage hurts men as well as women and children, but its effects are not evenly distributed. Among the college-educated, divorce has declined and unwed childbearing is rare. By contrast, among high school dropouts, most women will have their first child before getting married and rare is the unmarried couple who remains together for life.

The collapse of marriage among the uneducated and partially educated has unquestionably been a social and economic disaster. The data are overwhelming that children raised by married parents are happier, healthier, do better in school, and are more likely to attend and finish college than their peers from single-parent homes. This is true without regard to race or ethnicity. In fact, being raised by a single mother is a better predictor of poverty than race or ancestry.

Those concerned about income inequality, poverty and social health, I argued (and I was joined in this by my fellow panelists), must be concerned about rebuilding the marriage norm. I cited the successful effort to reduce teen pregnancy (it's dropped 50 percent in recent years). A similar campaign to stress the importance of stable families could yield huge benefits for the most vulnerable populations in our society.

Only in the question-and-answer session did the issue that so absorbed Milbank arise: How this affects elections. Responding to a question, we noted the glaringly unsurprising fact that the gender gap between Democrats and Republicans is actually a marriage gap. Single women vote disproportionately for Democrats and married women vote by a comfortable margin for Republicans.

The decline of marriage inclines more women to vote Democrat. They are, quite understandably, looking for security (a la "The Life of Julia"). It's obviously not a good campaign strategy for Republican office-seekers to lecture women about marching to the altar before having children.

But, believe it or not, it's useful to think about and discuss important social trends without always appending a D or an R to them. Serious people can seek out the illuminating research by Isabel Sawhill, Charles Murray, Barbara Dafoe Whitehead, Elaine Kamarck, W. Bradford Wilcox and other scholars.

Fans of shallow snark will enjoy Milbank's work.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: condoleezarice; demonrats; republican; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: GOPsterinMA

Post #16 is for you too.


21 posted on 04/04/2014 8:43:01 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks!


22 posted on 04/04/2014 9:13:11 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (You're a very weird person, Yossarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Or, put another way, real women put their families first. Democrat women put themselves first.


23 posted on 04/04/2014 10:20:42 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

And other women don’t?


24 posted on 04/04/2014 10:28:18 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

That is true


25 posted on 04/04/2014 10:56:04 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rumplemeyer

I luv it.


26 posted on 04/04/2014 10:58:18 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
Real women, like real men, put their families first. I can see that in my own mother, aged 92, who while struggling with the infirmities of daily life, is most concerned that she might forget to send someone in the family or a close friend a birthday or anniversary card.

It is such an important matter for her that I must bite my tongue when I'm tempted to say 'they are old enough to stop celebrating birthdays and just help her pick out and write a card.

I still believe that the reason the airlines advise passengers to put on their oxygen masks before helping their children in the event of an emergency is because the protective instinct is still so strong in real men and real women, despite the years of effort by the Libtard ruling class to surpress it.

27 posted on 04/04/2014 11:10:21 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Hilarious. . .and also dangerous because you know how ill-tempered, humorless and emotional liberal women are.
28 posted on 04/04/2014 3:25:17 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Feminist constituents control Republican campaigns then vote Democrat.


29 posted on 04/04/2014 4:45:43 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Re. the photo of Rice above the posted article,...

Rice: Better to have Hamas in power than in streets
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1733397/posts

Rice: Palestinians deserve to live free of ‘occupation’[at an event of pro-Palestinian group]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1717847/posts

US Supplies Fatah With Arms, Rice Decries “Occupation”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718348/posts

Rice: Israel Must Withdraw from More than Gaza and Samaria
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1333354/posts

Commencement Address at Boston College (Secretary Condoleezza Rice, Boston, Massachusetts, May 22, 2006. US Department of State)

Excerpts:

As a student of a Catholic high school, the Sisters of Loretta taught me, I am pleased to be at an institution of higher education with such strong and celebrated Catholic and Jesuit traditions . . . You see, I got my Master's Degree at Notre Dame. (Boos.) I acquired a passion for the fighting Irish . . . and my family has been college educated and Presbyterian ever since. (Laughter and applause.) . . . I wandered into a course on international politics taught by a Czech refugee who specialized in Soviet studies, a man who had a daughter by the name of Madeleine Albright. With that one class, I was hooked. I discovered that my passion was Russia and all things Russian.


30 posted on 04/04/2014 4:50:36 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
How Dramatically Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?

JOHN R. LOTT Jr.
American Enterprise Institute (AEI) (download links for whole document at bottom of page)

September 1998

University of Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 60
Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, Number 6, Part 1, pp. 1163-1198, December 1999

Abstract:
This paper examines the growth of government during this century as a result of giving women the right to vote. Using cross-sectional time-series data for 1870 to 1940, we examine state government expenditures and revenue as well as voting by U.S. House and Senate state delegations and the passage of a wide range of different state laws. Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in state government expenditures and revenue and more liberal voting patterns for federal representatives, and these effects continued growing over time as more women took advantage of the franchise. Contrary to many recent suggestions, the gender gap is not something that has arisen since the 1970s, and it helps explain why American government started growing when it did.

31 posted on 04/04/2014 4:51:46 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Part of the Republican gender gap can be explained by the city vs. rural gender gap. In some cities young women outnumber young men 2 to 1. Cities are communes where most everything a person uses from housing to transportation is shared property. Their personally owned possessions are minimal (excluding shoes). Renters are majority Democrat, owners are majority Republican. Many women don’t like to drive so when unmarried, big city life suits them. Many little princesses move to the big city castle to meet their rich handsome prince, only to find out too late that the unmarried princes are either unwilling to commit or gay.


32 posted on 04/04/2014 5:32:09 PM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; GOPsterinMA
Yeah you probably would like nothing better than women barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.

Pregnant? Certainly not. And she can wear flip flops. See, I'm reasonable. ;)

33 posted on 04/05/2014 1:29:18 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Kaslin

Agreed. No need to breed more idiocy, whether they’re shod footed or not.


34 posted on 04/05/2014 1:35:36 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (You're a very weird person, Yossarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

Okay, chauvinistic pig if you say so


35 posted on 04/05/2014 1:46:45 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You’re classy. I love you.


36 posted on 04/05/2014 1:49:36 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (You're a very weird person, Yossarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Impy

You have many cats, don’t you?


37 posted on 04/05/2014 1:54:25 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (You're a very weird person, Yossarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson