His proposed Liberty Amendments on the other fall egregiously short of dealing with the most obvious and egregious flaws in the original document.
Please elaborate.
OK, how about four more times... I've talked about this here, here, here, and here. There are probably more.
Yes, we have had much of this discussion about the Constitution's flaws before, and you agreed that what I regarded as deficiencies are legitimate criticisms of the Constitution as ratified. We disagreed about the degree to which Henry or Jefferson (had he been present) could have changed that. I suspect foul play was one of the reasons he was not there. Are you changing your mind about those problems?
Levin's "Liberty Amendments" do not address those deficiencies. I expect him to fix it or I will continue to criticize his plan publicly. Yes, I have flagged him on those threads and FR mailed him on the topic, but I have not heard any change. I guess he's just too important to bother with peons like FReepers.