Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thorium Powered Car Could Run 100 Years On Just 8 Grams of Fuel
.collective-evolution.com ^ | March 5, 2014 | Arjun Walia.

Posted on 03/14/2014 12:42:38 PM PDT by ckilmer

Atomic Car Revisited: Thorium Could Power A Vehicle for 100 Years?

Boldride
 

A car that could run for 100 years on one tank of fuel? It sounds like a far-fetched idea, but it is just what a company is apparently claiming possible with the use of an atomic fuel that was abandoned during the Nixon administration. We’re talking about the sounds-too-good-to-be-true substance called “Thorium.”

Thorium is a naturally occurring radioactive element. It was discovered in 1828 by a Norwegian mineralogist and identified by a Swedish chemist, who then named it after the Norse god, Thor.

ATOMIC CARS: See Photos of the 1957 Ford Nucleon Concept

00-Thorium

According to this video from The Young Turks (which is informative, if a little low-rent at times), if put to use properly, would be low pressure and have lower chances of danger to the environment and humans than a uranium-based reactor. The thorium reactors can be much smaller too. Like a conventional reactor, the heat produced would create steam that would power a turbine:

The report claims that small amount of the dense thorium could produce tremendous amounts of heat. A company called Laser Power Systems is attempting to employ this power source in a vehicle. The company claims that: “1 gram [of thorium] yields more energy than 7,396 gallons of gas.” By their math, 8 grams of the substance could power a thorium turbine car for a century. This is not the first time this fuel has been suggested for cars. The concept of an automobile use was brought up in the 2011 documentary “The Thorium Dream”:

RELATED: See Photos of the 1963 Chrysler Turbine

It has also been envisioned as a power source futuristic-looking designs like the Cadillac World Thorium Fuel Concept, shown here.

PHOTOS: See More of the 2009 Cadillac World Thorium Fuel Concept

01-Thorium

Could this be a viable fuel for car? The testing in the 1960s found that the Thorium tetrafluoride used in a molten salt reactor was easier to process and quicker to stop a chain reaction, but light water reactors are far more common. In the LWR, thorium produces the same levels of toxic waste as our good ole’ uranium reactor. So there still may be a long way to go before we’re driving atomic cars.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: energy; fission; nuclearenergy; thorium; thoriumcar; thoriumreactor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: chrisser

If you could build a reactor small enough for a car, seems it would make more sense to build one that was house-sized.

Then you could maybe sink it into the ground in the back yard for easy shielding, and you wouldn’t need to worry about crashes.

If we all had small power plants in our homes, then electric cars might not be so impractical.
__________________

That is already being done. There are town sized reactors being built in Texas. Great option for communities.


21 posted on 03/14/2014 12:57:31 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
The 1963 Chrysler Turbine was ugly, even for 1963. :-)

This guy's family had one of the prototypes for a few months:

http://turbinecar.com/turbine.html

22 posted on 03/14/2014 12:59:34 PM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

Thorium is a naturally occurring, slightly radioactive metal. It is estimated to be about three to four times more abundant than uranium in the Earth’s crust. Prices aren’t available as it’s not for sale.


23 posted on 03/14/2014 1:00:27 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
Depends on how pure you need it. I bet that you can still find thorium glass replacement mantles for Coleman lanterns.

Coleman no longer uses thorium in their product, but I'd bet the cheapo replacement ones do.

24 posted on 03/14/2014 1:00:56 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
Then you could maybe sink it into the ground in the back yard for easy shielding, and you wouldn’t need to worry about crashes.

Like this? Small Modular Reactor

(unfortunately, the project has been shelved)

25 posted on 03/14/2014 1:02:18 PM PDT by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: henkster

26 posted on 03/14/2014 1:02:39 PM PDT by Theoria (End Socialism : No more GOP and Dem candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Can you give us a hint where these town-sized reactors are being built?


27 posted on 03/14/2014 1:03:41 PM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The thorium molten salt reactor would work very well for highly localized power production, making it possible for the immediate area to be taken off the grid if massive power failures should occur. For those industries, or otherwise isolated complexes, that cannot be allowed to lose power flow, in the event of grid failure, it may be far the best solution, much more economical in the long run than standby Diesel generation plants.


28 posted on 03/14/2014 1:03:50 PM PDT by alloysteel (Obamacare - Death and Taxes now available online. One-stop shopping at its best!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

You can’t turn it off.......................


29 posted on 03/14/2014 1:04:24 PM PDT by Red Badger (LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

http://www.itheo.org/articles/world%E2%80%99s-first-thorium-reactor-designed


30 posted on 03/14/2014 1:05:33 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

The photo didn’t come through on my browser....


31 posted on 03/14/2014 1:06:16 PM PDT by henkster (I don't like bossy women telling me what words I can't use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bagman

The company was out of texas. I have been following them for a few years.

http://theenergycollective.com/ansorg/201641/update-and-perspective-small-modular-reactor-development


32 posted on 03/14/2014 1:10:04 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Hmmmm, maybe the return of the steam locomotive.


33 posted on 03/14/2014 1:10:35 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

If you can’t beat it, ban it.


34 posted on 03/14/2014 1:11:46 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; ...

Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....

If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST jut FReepmail me..... This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....

35 posted on 03/14/2014 1:13:36 PM PDT by Red Badger (LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Just a few problems here. First, thorium is not fissile, which means that it does not fission when it absorbs a neutron (to be a little more exact, it fissions only if it absorbs a fast neutron), so, to be used in a reactor, it must be seeded with a fissile isotope, like uranium-235, uranium-233, or plutonium-239. The idea behind thorium reactors is that the thorium absorbs a neutron, becoming thorium-233, which then decays to uranium-233, but you’ve got to put up some initial U-233 (or U-235 or Pu-239) to get the reactor going.

The other problem is that the author of this article does not understand the concept of critical mass. To sustain a chain reaction, one must have some minimum mass of a fissile material to make it work. The mass depends on the geometry (a sphere of plutonium-239 roughly the size of a baseball and weighing a few kilograms makes a dandy critical mass as was demonstrated several times in 1945 - on the other hand give me tons of Pu-239 in a sheet ten feet wide and an inch thick, and it will never acheive a self-sustaining chain reaction, regardless of long the sheet is). For normal purposes, the critical mass of an isotope is measured in kilograms, not grams.

I wouldn’t pre-order a thorium-powered car any time soon.


36 posted on 03/14/2014 1:14:38 PM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

http://www.amazon.com/Buck-Scientific-Inc-Standard-Solution/dp/B00CM21TGS/ref=sr_1_1?s=industrial&ie=UTF8&qid=1394827828&sr=1-1&keywords=thorium

Take it out of solution ($65 for 1,000 ppm in 500 ml of 2% HNO3), and you can get 8 grams for a whole lot less than gasoline for life (challenges ignored intentionally).


37 posted on 03/14/2014 1:15:15 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Prices aren’t available as it’s not for sale.

The people who make mantels for gas lanterns buy the stuff.

38 posted on 03/14/2014 1:16:13 PM PDT by null and void ( Obama is Law-Less because Republican "leaders" are BALL-LESS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
OK, and how much does 8 grams of Thorium cost?

"Today, thorium is relatively expensive - about $5,000 per kilogram. However, this is only because of there is currently little demand for thorium, so as a specialty metal, it is expensive. But there is 4 times as much thorium in the earth’s crust as there is uranium, and uranium is only $40/kg. If thorium starts to be mined en masse, its cost could drop to as low as $10/kg."

$40 at today's prices...

39 posted on 03/14/2014 1:19:05 PM PDT by null and void ( Obama is Law-Less because Republican "leaders" are BALL-LESS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
I remember reading someplace that the inertia of energy was equal to energy divided by the speed of light.
40 posted on 03/14/2014 1:20:02 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (In the long run, we are all dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson