To: GunRunner
Generally I agree with you. But if objective science is going to offer lamebrains like mechanical engineer turned stand-up comic turned "science guy" such as Bill Nye to defend evolution, then evidence and reason have got no chance.
Bill Nye is simply a scientific illiterate. His success as some iconic communicator of science is a horrifying tribute to how awful science education is in this country. Some of his "scientific" claims are real howlers; he has almost no understanding of physics or the current state of biochemistry/microbiology at all.
I can see Bill Nye losing big to a skinny bald guy in a red half-toga who claims the universe is an elephant on the backs of four turtles. Maybe even losing badly.
35 posted on
02/06/2014 2:48:09 PM PST by
FredZarguna
(Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
To: FredZarguna; metmom
"Bill Nye is simply a scientific illiterate." You can always tell when a debate is lost by those who believe in leftists science when they rip apart their own guy after he lost.
37 posted on
02/06/2014 3:01:13 PM PST by
celmak
To: FredZarguna
I'm still paused in the middle of the debate, and I agree Nye is a dweeb, who uses the same pop-culture non-scientific prop techniques to push global warming.
But Nye is really irrelevant here. Most people don't understand what the Wedge Strategy is, or that it's a front for literal Young Earth Creationism and flood geology. This is going to open a lot of eyes.
To: FredZarguna
I can see Bill Nye losing big to a skinny bald guy in a red half-toga who claims the universe is an elephant on the backs of four turtles. Maybe even losing badly. How does Ham beat the toga guy's argument?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson