Replies

No, in the post I explain why if this fictitious "time dilation" occurred because of an increase in 'c,' that also implies the universe was orders of magnitude more massive then than it is now. That is not possible. If the universe were just 10 times as massive as it is now -- and your new "theory" actually requires it to be trillions of times more massive -- the universe would have collapsed back into the singularity within a few hundred thousand years or less of the Big Bang [that is, a few seconds or less, in your fake "dilated" time.]

Not a very credible theory, that. Since we're all still here.

When you can incorporate dark energy and dark matter into your scoff, then I will listen. The 300,000 year inflationary period is not well understood, so I cannot account for what that period at the beginning may have played in the creation of the anti-matter of the Universe. Add to those two the fact that we humans have yet to actually comprehend what dimension Time is, and, well, scalar waves of reality waft from your certainty like puffs of smoke from a teepee.

Incidentally little man, I have not even mentioned 'time dilation', so your effort to attack that strawman is quite telling. What I have posted is Dr Schroeder's explanation, which does not include what you are trying to attack. But if you would actually read the link I provided, you might even know that your strawman is foolishness ... making you something of a fool, frankly.

For lurkers, here is what Schroeder actually says in the short essay at the link I provided regarding Time, and it is almost exactly opposite to what Fred is trying to attack:

The Flexible flow of time and the stretching of space
Einstein taught the world that time is relative. That in regions of high velocity or high gravity time actually passes more slowly relative to regions of lower gravity or lower velocity. (One system relative to another, hence the name, the laws of relativity.) This is now proven fact. Time actually stretches out. Were ever you are time is normal for you because your biology is part of that local system.
That is Einstein and gravity and velocity. But there is a third aspect of the universe that changes the perception of time, Not gravity and not velocity. That is the stretching of space. The universe started as a minuscule speck, perhaps not larger that a grain of mustard and stretched out from there. Space actually stretches. The effect of the stretching of space produces the effect that when observing an event that took place far from our galaxy, as the light from that event travels through space and the sequence of events travels through space, the information is actually stretched out. (In The Science of God I give the logic in detail in simple easy to understand terms.)

Honest debate requires honest refutation, not attacking a strawman deception, as Fred has tried to do. There is another, very prominent figure who tries to lie his way through any issue, but he's called pResident. Fred is just a dud.