Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper
...many evolutionists are NOT HAPPY about Bill Nye taking on Mr. Ham.

I imagine it's for two reasons. One, nothing will be accomplished. When the dust settles, the supporters of Creationism will still support creationism and the supporters of evolution will still support evolution. All is does is give creationism a thin covering of science. And two, come on. It's Bill Nye, a kids show host. Do you want people to think he's speaking for you?

15 posted on 02/03/2014 10:44:02 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg; sickoflibs

Yeah, OK, like evolution strictly follows the scientific method - anything historically-based is not a hard science. It does not follow the scientific method. It is neither observable nor repeatable. And it is not falsifiable so it really doesn’t matter who is included in the debate, just a bunch of hot air [no, not referring to global warming - another hoax of our times].


16 posted on 02/03/2014 10:51:01 AM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Spoken like a true product of public school education.


18 posted on 02/03/2014 10:56:07 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Ken Ham has also done a lot more research than Nye on this topic. He’ll mop the floor with him.


27 posted on 02/03/2014 11:36:24 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson