To: DoodleDawg; sickoflibs
Yeah, OK, like evolution strictly follows the scientific method - anything historically-based is not a hard science. It does not follow the scientific method. It is neither observable nor repeatable. And it is not falsifiable so it really doesn’t matter who is included in the debate, just a bunch of hot air [no, not referring to global warming - another hoax of our times].
To: BrandtMichaels
It does not follow the scientific method. It is neither observable nor repeatable. And it is not falsifiable so it really doesnt matter who is included in the debate, just a bunch of hot air... You realize you just describe creationism to a tee as well, don't you?
To: BrandtMichaels; DoodleDawg
RE :”
Yeah, OK, like evolution strictly follows the scientific method - anything historically-based is not a hard science. It does not follow the scientific method. It is neither observable nor repeatable. And it is not falsifiable so it really doesnt matter who is included in the debate, just a bunch of hot air [no, not referring to global warming - another hoax of our times].” There is some truth to that, however the fact that evolutionists have falsified different evolutionary theories when new finds didn't fit them sets it apart from Creationist science.
Creationism Science is just ‘Look over there, don't look over here. Everything just appeared a few thousand years ago and that's all there is too it. Now lets get back to those missing bones’
19 posted on
02/03/2014 10:59:19 AM PST by
sickoflibs
(Obama : 'Any path to US citizenship for illegals HERE is a special path to it ')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson