Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Department will revise its stance on racial profiling
PBS Newshour ^ | January 16, 2014 | Staff

Posted on 01/16/2014 5:28:38 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Under pressure from civil rights groups and Congressional Democrats, the Justice Department will revise its stance on racial profiling, reports The New York Times. That revision will restrict officials from considering religion, national origin, gender and sexual orientation in their investigations.

The Justice Department has been working on the revision for several years. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder himself has spoken out about his intention to modify the Department's definition of racial profiling, including in a 2010 speech where he pledged to end racial profiling "once and for all."

"Racial profiling is wrong. It can leave a lasting scar on communities and individuals. And it is, quite simply, bad policing - whatever city, whatever state."

While the changes have not been made public, the New York Times made clear that Holder discussed his intentions with New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio Wednesday. De Blasio, the city's mayor of January 1, was elected partly on a platform of ending the stop-and-frisk policy. In August, a federal judge ruled that strategy unconstitutional, claiming that the tactic violates the constitutional rights of minorities. Last November, the attorney general filed a brief in the case against the policy, suggesting the need for federal monitoring.

Holder has not been alone in criticizing racial profiling. In early 2001, President George W. Bush condemned the practice and promised to see its end. Likewise, John Ashcroft, the attorney general under Bush, called racial profiling unconstitutional in 2002. But after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, dozens of Muslim men with no ties to terrorism were arrested and detained and thousands were required to register their nationalities with authorities.

With the Justice Department facing increasing demands to address civil rights issues, Holder has stressed his commitment to civil liberties groups. In 2012, he expressed concern over Arizona's Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act and said that the department would "closely monitor" the impact of the law. Most recently, the Justice department investigated the death of Trayvon Martin, a Florida teenager widely assumed to have been killed by George Zimmerman because of racial motives.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ericholder; newyork; racialprofiling; trayvon
I'm sure it took a lot of "pressure" to get General Holder to makes these changes.
1 posted on 01/16/2014 5:28:38 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Does the DOJ have a WIDE stance?


2 posted on 01/16/2014 5:29:34 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

BOLO: Human being. No further details.


3 posted on 01/16/2014 5:35:33 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No profiling ... no problem.

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

4 posted on 01/16/2014 5:36:20 PM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Doesn’t matter as there are what, 15 members of Muzlum bro’hood in the whit3 house already?


5 posted on 01/16/2014 5:44:32 PM PST by CincyRichieRich (Pajama-boy-in-chief's beatings continue until morale improves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They are A-OK with racial profiling when they are making campaign commercials and handing out welfare checks.


6 posted on 01/16/2014 5:44:49 PM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Under pressure from civil rights groups and Congressional Democrats, the Justice Department will revise its stance on racial profiling ..


             

7 posted on 01/16/2014 5:46:52 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

I don’t hang out on Martin Luther King Blvd. Is that racial profiling?


8 posted on 01/16/2014 5:48:23 PM PST by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So will that mean the end of hiring quotas— ummm I mean racial profiling in hiring?


9 posted on 01/16/2014 5:49:41 PM PST by DaveyB ("When injustice becomes the law; rebellion becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

One mans “racial profiling” is another man’s common sense. Guess which side will grope Granny at the airport?


10 posted on 01/16/2014 5:52:05 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We should also restrict officials from considering genus and species.


11 posted on 01/16/2014 5:54:55 PM PST by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; JRandomFreeper; greeneyes; Kartographer
STOP “DUMB BLOND” PROFILING! I am blond and not dumb. You may spell it “Blond” or Blonde”, the meaning is the same. Rise up all smart blond(e or not)women and demand prison time for blond(e) profiling!

She was so blonde...
She got stabbed in a shoot-out.
She put lipstick on her forehead because she wanted to make up her mind.
She told me to meet her at the corner of ‘walk’ and ‘don't walk’.
She tried to put M&Ms in alphabetical order.
She tried to drown a fish.
She thought a quarterback was a refund.
She got locked in a grocery store and starved to death.
If you gave her a penny for intelligence, you'd get change back.

12 posted on 01/16/2014 6:02:07 PM PST by Marcella ((Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In early 2001, President George W. Bush condemned the practice and promised to see its end.

What a stupid Progressive tool he was

13 posted on 01/16/2014 6:10:18 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It would be difficult to think of another AG as awful as Eric Holder. But then his boss is the worst prez in history.


14 posted on 01/16/2014 6:15:19 PM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Holder. Keep pushing. Please, keep pushing.

That little Bill of Rights, just a bump in the road.


15 posted on 01/16/2014 6:17:11 PM PST by hadaclueonce (Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
They are A-OK with racial profiling when they are making campaign commercials and handing out welfare checks.

Or threatening schools that there must be racial justice in the punishment of students (i.e., outcomes, regardless of actions).

16 posted on 01/16/2014 6:28:10 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ...

> That revision will restrict officials from considering religion, national origin, gender and sexual orientation in their investigations.

IOW, the description of the suspect will no longer be used. It’s an expansion of the TSA approach of “random search”. Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.

Obama weighing executive action on minimum wage hike
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3112565/posts


17 posted on 01/16/2014 6:30:03 PM PST by SunkenCiv (;http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Most recently, the Justice department investigated the death of Trayvon Martin, a Florida teenager widely assumed to have been killed by George Zimmerman because of racial motives.

THAT was never proven... The only people who 'assume' it was racial are blacks and elite liberals. The rest of us believe what the findings of the court and FBI investigations showed. Of course facts don't matter to elite liberals - nothing dissuades them from believing whatever they want to believe...

18 posted on 01/16/2014 8:03:34 PM PST by GOPJ ("Remember who the real enemy is... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson