No where in the report does it say the old man got threateningly aggressive FIRST. Some can read into plain English whatever they want it to say.
It says the texter was turned around to the old man seated behind him and threw something that hit the old man and that the texter’s wife was trying to restrain her texting hubby . That my friend was the initial and justifying aggression. Telling some idiot to turn off the damn phone in the theater was not threatening.
This story is a odd twist for me.
I am sure I will be killed asking some fool to be quiet in a theatre.
Texting in the auditorium is distracting even during previews. The texted should have stepped out.
The shooter had gone out to ask the employees to take care of the problem.
I have thought in this scenario I would buy a large soda and pour it over the persons head. Then they will stab me to death.
I don’t think you get it —
No one else was complaining about the silent undetectable texting but quickdraw.
Then he left the auditorium and all was peaceful and quiet.
Then quickdraw returned WITHOUT management and started the fight all over again.
Quickdraw was the instigator and continuator of the fight from start to finish.
Why did the woman texter from three weeks before think it was threatening?