Posted on 12/31/2013 7:29:24 AM PST by Abathar
Okay, I had to LOL when I read this part...
Bunk.
There is zero global warming.
It is all a huge scam.
The model I use now to measure my death doesn't take into consideration that I will be MORE dead then than now.
Whew. Just in time to rescue the “climate scientists” trapped in the ice in Antarctica during the summer heat wave. Blunder down under? Natural process of cleaning up the gene pool?
The hoax that won’t die. These folks will never give up as long as there is grant money to be gained. Science has been indelibly besmirched by this sorry tale.
Before the debate about the meaning of a pile of numbers can begin:
1. Where is the scientific equipments calibration certification documents for each every sensor used to derive said numbers over the time span of the collection sample?
2. Is the calibration certification verifiable and not possible to be altered by any source once the certification is sealed?
3. For the data from these calbrated sensors, demonstrate the chain of custody that is unalterable from the sensor, its time and date, to the output final documents (charts, graphs, tables). The data must be verifiable as unchanged, accurate and true by any and all that investigate the data. This includes surprise inspections.
If workers are required to work under these condition inside a nuke plant (and they are) why should data that supposedly threatens the entire Earth in one way or another not be held to the same scrutiny?
Is it my imagination or can you actually spot the coordinated propaganda efforts these days?
Expect several more ‘climate change’ stories to follow
The we must ban oceans, rivers and lakes immediately...............
Lying sos, satanist, communist MF’ers all!
Another New Year, Another New Spin On Global Warming.....
Being an old PMEL Calibration guy, those statements are valid.
But having said that, the use and placement of the sensors is very important, if not more so.
http://www.surfacestations.org/odd_sites.htm
Oh and out of the 73 computer models in use... NONE OF THEM CAN PREDICT THE CLIMATE TODAY WHEN THEY ARE PROGRAMMED WITH THE ACTUAL RECORDED CLIMATE HISTORY THAT WE KNOW IS TRUE... THEY ARE ALL LIES BASED UPON LIES TO REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH AND TO PASSIFY THOSE THAT WORSHIP MAN AND NATURE BUT DENY GOD!
The marijuana cloud they've been smoking?
Like when Al Gore said in 2008 that the icecap at the North Pole would be gone within 5 years?
That would be today. And instead it’s bigger than ever. Winters are harsher, and last longer.
The world has been pumping out CO2 at record levels for the last 15 years. If the assumption is that CO2 is the direct driver of a warmer climate, why haven’t world temperatures gone up at all in that time?
Clearly the assumption is wrong.
They simply re-jiggered their models to fit them with past data and future preferences.
Right now warming is somewhere less than 1C per century and dropping. Unless his "corrected" model shows how and when it is supposed to accelerate I wouldn't give it a second thought.
OTOH, there is a nifty tug of war between the old school "it will get really warm" alarmsts and the "will you look at all those storms!" alarmists. Both sides contradict each other. What is missing in the piece about this research is that there must be less convection an fewer storms both tropical and in the mid-latitudes in summer.
“The hoax that wont die. These folks will never give up as long as there is grant money to be gained. Science has been indelibly besmirched by this sorry tale.”
*******************
Absolutely correct! Grant Money is what it is all about. A$$holes!
when you’re dead wrong, just double down!
I should try these tactics in the next argument I have with the wife lol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.