Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Sarah Palin have a second act?
USA Today | November 10, 2013 | Susan Page

Posted on 11/10/2013 5:08:08 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Link only due to copyright issues: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/10/will-sarah-palin-have-a-second-act/3489845/


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: palin; sarahpalin; shutdown; teaparty; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: Farnsworth
Ubama and his Democrat enablers are getting pretty scary for the average voter.
101 posted on 11/10/2013 8:14:32 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We’ll see if it’s enough in 14. Obviously not enough for Virginians.


102 posted on 11/10/2013 8:17:15 PM PST by Farnsworth (Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: leprechaun9

Bolton is the latest version of the GOPe foreign policy establishment that goes through Condi Rice and Colin Powell back to James Baker, George Schultz, Al Haig, Henry Kissinger and John Foster Dulles.

Dulles back in the 1950’s made tough anti-communist speeches but cut deals like the one at Geneva in 1955 that
created a communist state in North Vietnam.

Picking Bolton as a running mate would be like picking Christie or Jeb Bush as a running mate with a tougher tone of language on foreign policy.


103 posted on 11/10/2013 9:00:02 PM PST by Nextrush (BALANCED BUDGET NOW AND PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth
"If all of BO’s transgression still got him re-elected and of the ones that follow don’t seem to matter."

That was before the Obamacare rollout, which, I think, was a "watershed moment" for both Obama's supporters and the media. I think that the media's blanket support of both "O" and "O-care" has seriously damaged media credibility among the "O" supporters.

104 posted on 11/11/2013 3:46:51 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
She's lost nothing, and remains as popular with the conservative base as ever.

She kinda lost me when she endorsed McCain for re-election. That being said, I would like to see her deeply involved in the 2014 midterms. Joe Carr in Tennessee needs a boost. Soon.

105 posted on 11/11/2013 3:53:55 AM PST by don-o (Hit the FReepathon hard and fast! Nail this one for the Jimmer. Do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

WE are not in the majority... not in the House or Senate. We have 18 Senate seats and about 80 Conservatives in the House... an “r” means nothing in DC today... except that the majority of “r”’s are progressive.


106 posted on 11/11/2013 3:54:48 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CelesteChristi
As for impeachment that process begins in the Senate.

Really? Since when?

107 posted on 11/11/2013 3:58:18 AM PST by don-o (Hit the FReepathon hard and fast! Nail this one for the Jimmer. Do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
I would like for imus to experience retroactive birth control!
108 posted on 11/11/2013 3:58:28 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RightLady
Sarah can do more for us in the Senate.

Yes! And for me, her road there begins with the 2014 challenges to RINO incumbents. Get her on the ground, many times, in every one of these races. There is big potential upside for her in that role.

It's fun to fantasize about POTUS. But, she is not viable for 2016. Maybe after two terms of a Cruz Presidency...

Right now, her power is most effectively used in defeating all the Senate RINOS that are up in 2014.

109 posted on 11/11/2013 4:13:49 AM PST by don-o (Hit the FReepathon hard and fast! Nail this one for the Jimmer. Do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama is pRes_ _ent because of Mitt Romney and Rove.
In 2008, THEY backstabbed her and her family.

In 2010, they defended Obama’s LACK OF DOCUMENTATION.

In 2012, Romney gave up and stole all the money
conservatives had donated with Rove, stranding thousands
of helpers without a penny.

America was destroyed by Obama, Romney and the GOP.


110 posted on 11/11/2013 4:28:54 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sarah on the Today Show today.... Military sure looks happy to see her.


111 posted on 11/11/2013 6:42:01 AM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf
I have as much right to my observations and opinions as you do yours. As a matter of fact, it is obvious I'm more informed and logical than you. You're enjoying the Obama reign of terror, are you?

{^) LOLOLOLOL!!!! Stop it! Yer killin' me!!! It's the "I'm more informed and logical than you" that gets me -- WHERE, Dear Oh-So-Logical, did I even imply that you don't have as much right to your observations and opinions as I do mine? WHAT "logic" in your brain even provoked you to write such an inane thing?

Had Romney won, and I wrote to you that you were enjoying how he was advancing the homosexual agenda and supporting attempts to punish adoption agencies, youth groups, schools, wedding services from catering and photography to cake bakers, churches, dating services, and anyone in the U.S. military, who civilly refused to "do business" so to speak with open homosexuals, what would you tell me?

Because that is exactly what your guy Romney would be doing. He would also be pushing the environmentalist agenda, he would be pushing nationalized health care, he would be pushing gun control, he would be pushing essentially EVERYTHING Obama is pushing, except he would be doing it under the "Republican" banner, and we would all be here screaming and yelping the same as we yelp and scream at what John McCain does in office.

And if I wrote to you, "You're enjoying the Romney reign of government tyranny, aren't you?" I would be being a horse's ass just as you are being a horse's ass now.

No, it isn't that you're more logical and better informed, it's that you can't handle a) someone disagreeing with you and b) that more people loathed your guy Romney than you or I ever expected. Romney lost because HE WAS A VERY BAD CANDIDATE. Obama won because Romney WAS A VERY BAD CANDIDATE.

112 posted on 11/11/2013 7:59:37 AM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
WE are not in the majority.

Well DUH! Exactly how then do you expect to ever win a national election with a small group of 'my way or the highway' conservatives?

113 posted on 11/11/2013 10:56:19 AM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

Let me answer you with another question... isn’t it the very definition of insanity to keep doing the same thing election after election and losing every single time?

One cannot compromise with evil and all of the left and their agenda is evil. One cannot compromise with communists without becoming a communist... and that is what we have at its base... marxists in the republican party and the American marxist party of dims... and both of those entities hate people like me. WHY should I work with people that hate me for agenda that destroys me? I will not do that any longer... never again.

LLS


114 posted on 11/11/2013 11:06:32 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Yer killin' me!!!

You poor thing. I had no idea you were so sensitive.

did I even imply that you don't have as much right to your observations and opinions

'Oh, put a sock in it, for crying out loud.'

your guy Romney

He wasn't my guy. Your assumptions are evidence of your lack of intellect and ability to think clearly.

115 posted on 11/11/2013 11:09:23 AM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
Let me answer you with another question

Why not just provide an answer or propose a solution? I'm not aware of any conservatives who are willing to surrender or compromise with communists, Marxists, fascists or left wing fanatics. I've never suggested or hinted that we do.

116 posted on 11/11/2013 11:15:27 AM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

My solution is this... the dims are a prime example of how to win... and when they lose... how to destroy those that defeat you so as to neutralize their power and through incrementalism... how to fundamentally change America. We need to emulate their tenacity and their refusal to compromise or reach across the isle. We cannot do that today with the numbers as they are. We start using the same tactics used against us on our enemies (both republican and dims) and we must replace the current leadership and drive the crony capitalist money-bags from the party... the ones that want 40 million mexican invaders to be granted super citizen status. If that does not work... Mark Levin’s plan may be viable. Short of that... Reagan said “Government is the problem”... and if all else fails... then we may have to go our separate ways.


117 posted on 11/11/2013 11:23:20 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
We cannot do that today with the numbers as they are.

I already stated that. How do you propose that we change the numbers?

118 posted on 11/11/2013 11:26:50 AM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

Throw out the bums and get behind my Congressman’s bill (Stephen Palazzo) and make boehner put it up for a vote. BTW, it is to limit terms of elected office in the House and Senate. Those two things alone will start the process. Short of that... my solutions are well lain out in my post before this one. Read my post again if needed.


119 posted on 11/11/2013 12:04:26 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

Oh, and get behind only Conservative candidates and those that stood and fought for us in the shutdown and defund effort. All others are enemies and capitulators. There are no easy and quick solutions and the only way to elect good Conservatives is race by race and stop sending money to reince and the republicrats. It took over 100 years for the left to take us down to the brink of collapse and a soviet styled government... it will not be changed completely overnight.


120 posted on 11/11/2013 12:09:41 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson